File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Data Objects: New Things or No-Thing More than Ignis Fatuus

TitleData Objects: New Things or No-Thing More than Ignis Fatuus
Authors
Issue Date13-Mar-2025
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Law, Innovation and Technology, 2025, v. 17 How to Cite?
Abstract

English academics have belatedly awoken to the challenge to the law posed by the computer revolution that started in the late twentieth century. Inspired by American jurisprudence, technophile lawyers unfamiliar with the complexities of conceptualising property liberally propose to extend property law concepts to digital files, including a recent attempt to do so by postulating a three-layer model of digital files to enable ‘ownership’ at the logical layer. Meanwhile, American academics, facing some resistance in the courts, have continued to propound the case for data property. This paper exposes the many dangers of the concept of property within the common law, the failures of recent proposals on both sides of the Atlantic to address the underlying technical workings of computing, and the perils that such ill-considered extensions of property will pose to legal development.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362505
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.761

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeng, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorLow, Fatt Kin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-25T00:30:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-25T00:30:14Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-13-
dc.identifier.citationLaw, Innovation and Technology, 2025, v. 17-
dc.identifier.issn1757-9961-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362505-
dc.description.abstract<p>English academics have belatedly awoken to the challenge to the law posed by the computer revolution that started in the late twentieth century. Inspired by American jurisprudence, technophile lawyers unfamiliar with the complexities of conceptualising property liberally propose to extend property law concepts to digital files, including a recent attempt to do so by postulating a three-layer model of digital files to enable ‘ownership’ at the logical layer. Meanwhile, American academics, facing some resistance in the courts, have continued to propound the case for data property. This paper exposes the many dangers of the concept of property within the common law, the failures of recent proposals on both sides of the Atlantic to address the underlying technical workings of computing, and the perils that such ill-considered extensions of property will pose to legal development.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofLaw, Innovation and Technology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleData Objects: New Things or No-Thing More than Ignis Fatuus-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.eissn1757-997X-
dc.identifier.issnl1757-9961-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats