File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104842
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105010192115
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on etiology: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials
| Title | Efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on etiology: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Efficacy Etiology Hepatocellular carcinoma Network meta-analysis Systemic therapy |
| Issue Date | 1-Sep-2025 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2025, v. 213 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: Robust comparative data on the treatment efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on disease etiology are lacking. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analysis to evaluate the survival of patients with advanced HCC treated with systemic therapies based on etiology. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Databases, and trial registries were systematically searched for relevant studies from 1 January 2009 and 6 June 2024. Phase III randomized controlled trials of systemic therapies in advanced HCC patients with survival outcomes reported in at least one of the three etiology subgroups (hepatitis B virus , hepatitis C virus , or non-viral etiology) were recruited. Frequentist NMA was used to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of treatments and the P-score to rank the effectiveness of the treatments. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis with pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) was used to quantify the effect of treatments. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 29 RCTs encompassing 18,229 patients were included. In first-line trials. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo-bev) (P-score, 87 %) and STRIDE (P-score, 75 %) yielded the best OS benefits among all approved regimens in the HBV population; atezo-bev (P-score, 94 %) ranked the best in HCV patients. For non-viral aetiology, STRIDE (P-score, 79 %) ranked the best whereas atezo-bev (P-score, 29 %) ranked the worst. Pairwise MA showed that ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi has significantly different HR compared to control (sorafenib) in different etiology (HBV: 0.65, HCV: 0.72, and non-viral: 0.98, p = 0.01), while ICI has consistent HR compared to control irrespective of disease etiology (HBV: 0.81, HCV: 0.79, non-viral: 0.83, p = 0.94). Conclusion: Treatment efficacy of advanced HCC is affected by underlying liver disease. The survival benefit of ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi was mainly seen in viral-HCC. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362471 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.572 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wong, Charlene Hoi Lam | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, Kenneth Sik Kwan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lo, Regina Cheuk Lam | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chiang, Chi Leung | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T00:51:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-24T00:51:48Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2025, v. 213 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1040-8428 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362471 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Background: Robust comparative data on the treatment efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on disease etiology are lacking. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analysis to evaluate the survival of patients with advanced HCC treated with systemic therapies based on etiology. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Databases, and trial registries were systematically searched for relevant studies from 1 January 2009 and 6 June 2024. Phase III randomized controlled trials of systemic therapies in advanced HCC patients with survival outcomes reported in at least one of the three etiology subgroups (hepatitis B virus , hepatitis C virus , or non-viral etiology) were recruited. Frequentist NMA was used to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of treatments and the P-score to rank the effectiveness of the treatments. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis with pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) was used to quantify the effect of treatments. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 29 RCTs encompassing 18,229 patients were included. In first-line trials. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo-bev) (P-score, 87 %) and STRIDE (P-score, 75 %) yielded the best OS benefits among all approved regimens in the HBV population; atezo-bev (P-score, 94 %) ranked the best in HCV patients. For non-viral aetiology, STRIDE (P-score, 79 %) ranked the best whereas atezo-bev (P-score, 29 %) ranked the worst. Pairwise MA showed that ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi has significantly different HR compared to control (sorafenib) in different etiology (HBV: 0.65, HCV: 0.72, and non-viral: 0.98, p = 0.01), while ICI has consistent HR compared to control irrespective of disease etiology (HBV: 0.81, HCV: 0.79, non-viral: 0.83, p = 0.94). Conclusion: Treatment efficacy of advanced HCC is affected by underlying liver disease. The survival benefit of ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi was mainly seen in viral-HCC.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Efficacy | - |
| dc.subject | Etiology | - |
| dc.subject | Hepatocellular carcinoma | - |
| dc.subject | Network meta-analysis | - |
| dc.subject | Systemic therapy | - |
| dc.title | Efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on etiology: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104842 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105010192115 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 213 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1040-8428 | - |
