File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on etiology: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials

TitleEfficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on etiology: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials
Authors
KeywordsEfficacy
Etiology
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Network meta-analysis
Systemic therapy
Issue Date1-Sep-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2025, v. 213 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: Robust comparative data on the treatment efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on disease etiology are lacking. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analysis to evaluate the survival of patients with advanced HCC treated with systemic therapies based on etiology. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Databases, and trial registries were systematically searched for relevant studies from 1 January 2009 and 6 June 2024. Phase III randomized controlled trials of systemic therapies in advanced HCC patients with survival outcomes reported in at least one of the three etiology subgroups (hepatitis B virus , hepatitis C virus , or non-viral etiology) were recruited. Frequentist NMA was used to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of treatments and the P-score to rank the effectiveness of the treatments. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis with pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) was used to quantify the effect of treatments. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 29 RCTs encompassing 18,229 patients were included. In first-line trials. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo-bev) (P-score, 87 %) and STRIDE (P-score, 75 %) yielded the best OS benefits among all approved regimens in the HBV population; atezo-bev (P-score, 94 %) ranked the best in HCV patients. For non-viral aetiology, STRIDE (P-score, 79 %) ranked the best whereas atezo-bev (P-score, 29 %) ranked the worst. Pairwise MA showed that ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi has significantly different HR compared to control (sorafenib) in different etiology (HBV: 0.65, HCV: 0.72, and non-viral: 0.98, p = 0.01), while ICI has consistent HR compared to control irrespective of disease etiology (HBV: 0.81, HCV: 0.79, non-viral: 0.83, p = 0.94). Conclusion: Treatment efficacy of advanced HCC is affected by underlying liver disease. The survival benefit of ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi was mainly seen in viral-HCC.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362471
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.572

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Charlene Hoi Lam-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Kenneth Sik Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Regina Cheuk Lam-
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Chi Leung-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T00:51:48Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-24T00:51:48Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2025, v. 213-
dc.identifier.issn1040-8428-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362471-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: Robust comparative data on the treatment efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on disease etiology are lacking. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analysis to evaluate the survival of patients with advanced HCC treated with systemic therapies based on etiology. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Databases, and trial registries were systematically searched for relevant studies from 1 January 2009 and 6 June 2024. Phase III randomized controlled trials of systemic therapies in advanced HCC patients with survival outcomes reported in at least one of the three etiology subgroups (hepatitis B virus , hepatitis C virus , or non-viral etiology) were recruited. Frequentist NMA was used to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of treatments and the P-score to rank the effectiveness of the treatments. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis with pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) was used to quantify the effect of treatments. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 29 RCTs encompassing 18,229 patients were included. In first-line trials. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo-bev) (P-score, 87 %) and STRIDE (P-score, 75 %) yielded the best OS benefits among all approved regimens in the HBV population; atezo-bev (P-score, 94 %) ranked the best in HCV patients. For non-viral aetiology, STRIDE (P-score, 79 %) ranked the best whereas atezo-bev (P-score, 29 %) ranked the worst. Pairwise MA showed that ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi has significantly different HR compared to control (sorafenib) in different etiology (HBV: 0.65, HCV: 0.72, and non-viral: 0.98, p = 0.01), while ICI has consistent HR compared to control irrespective of disease etiology (HBV: 0.81, HCV: 0.79, non-viral: 0.83, p = 0.94). Conclusion: Treatment efficacy of advanced HCC is affected by underlying liver disease. The survival benefit of ICI + VEGF/VEGFRi was mainly seen in viral-HCC.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectEfficacy-
dc.subjectEtiology-
dc.subjectHepatocellular carcinoma-
dc.subjectNetwork meta-analysis-
dc.subjectSystemic therapy-
dc.titleEfficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on etiology: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104842-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105010192115-
dc.identifier.volume213-
dc.identifier.issnl1040-8428-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats