File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Structured prehospital chest pain assessment and clinical diagnostic score for prehospital identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction before an electrocardiogram

TitleStructured prehospital chest pain assessment and clinical diagnostic score for prehospital identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction before an electrocardiogram
Authors
Keywordschest pain
clinical diagnostic score
emergency department
prehospital emergency care
ST elevation myocardial infarction
Issue Date1-Apr-2025
PublisherWiley Open Access
Citation
Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, v. 32, n. 2 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: In resource-limited settings where prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG) is not available, prehospital recognition of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a structured prehospital questionnaire and develop a clinical diagnostic score for prehospital STEMI identification. Methods: We analyzed 324 adult patients with chest pain transported by ambulance in the Hong Kong West Cluster from 1 February 2018 to 12 August 2018. Participants' symptoms were systematically assessed by the ambulance crew using the standardized 5-item prehospital chest pain (PHCP) questionnaire, which produced a composite score, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated. Univariate analysis followed by multivariable backward logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of STEMI. A clinical diagnostic score, named the MANS score, was consequently developed based on the regression coefficients of these predictors and its discriminatory performance was compared with the PHCP score. Results: The PHCP score demonstrated suboptimal performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.79). The MANS score (male sex, aspirin use, and nausea or vomiting and sweating) was derived from three independent predictors: male sex (1 point), aspirin use (−2 points), and the cooccurrence of nausea or vomiting and sweating (1 point). The score ranges from −2 to 2, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of STEMI. The MANS score achieved an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.91). Conclusions: While the PHCP questionnaire exhibited suboptimal diagnostic performance, the MANS score may help to identify STEMI in the absence of prehospital ECG. Further external validation is necessary to evaluate its generalizability.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362442
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.297

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Chun Yiu-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Rex Pui Kin-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Kent Shek-
dc.contributor.authorKwok, Wing Man-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, Tat Chi-
dc.contributor.authorTsui, Matthew Sik Hon-
dc.contributor.authorRainer, Timothy Hudson-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T00:51:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-24T00:51:35Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025, v. 32, n. 2-
dc.identifier.issn1024-9079-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362442-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: In resource-limited settings where prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG) is not available, prehospital recognition of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a structured prehospital questionnaire and develop a clinical diagnostic score for prehospital STEMI identification. Methods: We analyzed 324 adult patients with chest pain transported by ambulance in the Hong Kong West Cluster from 1 February 2018 to 12 August 2018. Participants' symptoms were systematically assessed by the ambulance crew using the standardized 5-item prehospital chest pain (PHCP) questionnaire, which produced a composite score, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated. Univariate analysis followed by multivariable backward logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of STEMI. A clinical diagnostic score, named the MANS score, was consequently developed based on the regression coefficients of these predictors and its discriminatory performance was compared with the PHCP score. Results: The PHCP score demonstrated suboptimal performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.79). The MANS score (male sex, aspirin use, and nausea or vomiting and sweating) was derived from three independent predictors: male sex (1 point), aspirin use (−2 points), and the cooccurrence of nausea or vomiting and sweating (1 point). The score ranges from −2 to 2, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of STEMI. The MANS score achieved an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.91). Conclusions: While the PHCP questionnaire exhibited suboptimal diagnostic performance, the MANS score may help to identify STEMI in the absence of prehospital ECG. Further external validation is necessary to evaluate its generalizability.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley Open Access-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectchest pain-
dc.subjectclinical diagnostic score-
dc.subjectemergency department-
dc.subjectprehospital emergency care-
dc.subjectST elevation myocardial infarction-
dc.titleStructured prehospital chest pain assessment and clinical diagnostic score for prehospital identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction before an electrocardiogram -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hkj2.12070-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105002074834-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.eissn2309-5407-
dc.identifier.issnl1024-9079-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats