File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Method evaluation for viruses in activated sludge: Concentration, sequencing, and identification

TitleMethod evaluation for viruses in activated sludge: Concentration, sequencing, and identification
Authors
KeywordsActivated sludge
Flocculation filtration and resuspension
Phages
Tangential flow filtration
Virus
Wastewater treatment plants
Issue Date10-Dec-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Science of The Total Environment, 2024, v. 955 How to Cite?
Abstract

Activated sludge (AS) in wastewater treatment plants is one of the largest artificial microbial ecosystems on earth and it makes enormous contributions to human societies. Viruses are an important component in AS with a high abundance. However, their communities and functionalities have not been as widely explored as those of other microorganisms, such as bacteria. This gap is mainly due to technical challenges in effective viral concentration, extraction, and sequencing. In this study, we compared four kinds of concentration methods, two sequencing approaches, and four identification bioinformatic tools to evaluate the whole analysis workflow for viruses in AS. Results showed flocculation, filtration, and resuspension (FFR) could get the longest DNA lengths and ultracentrifugation obtained the highest DNA yields for viruses in AS. Based on the results of present study, FFR and tangential flow filtration with the membrane pore size of 100 kDa were most recommended to concentrate viruses in AS samples with huge volumes. Besides, different concentration methods could get different viral catalogs and thus multiple methods should be combined to get the whole picture of viruses in the system. In addition, geNomad was the most recommended identification tool for viruses in the present study and the long-read sequencing could improve the assembly statistics of viruses when compared with the short-read sequencing. For the 8192 viral operational taxonomic units in this study, 95.1 % of them were phages and belonged to the same lineage at the order level of Caudovirales. Virulent phages dominated the AS system and Pseudomonadota were the main host. Taken together, this study provides new insights into methods selection for virus research of AS.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362225
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.998

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yulin-
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Xiawan-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Weifu-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Dou-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xi-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yulin-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Tong-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-20T00:30:53Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-20T00:30:53Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-10-
dc.identifier.citationScience of The Total Environment, 2024, v. 955-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362225-
dc.description.abstract<p>Activated sludge (AS) in wastewater treatment plants is one of the largest artificial microbial ecosystems on earth and it makes enormous contributions to human societies. Viruses are an important component in AS with a high abundance. However, their communities and functionalities have not been as widely explored as those of other microorganisms, such as bacteria. This gap is mainly due to technical challenges in effective viral concentration, extraction, and sequencing. In this study, we compared four kinds of concentration methods, two sequencing approaches, and four identification bioinformatic tools to evaluate the whole analysis workflow for viruses in AS. Results showed flocculation, filtration, and resuspension (FFR) could get the longest DNA lengths and ultracentrifugation obtained the highest DNA yields for viruses in AS. Based on the results of present study, FFR and tangential flow filtration with the membrane pore size of 100 kDa were most recommended to concentrate viruses in AS samples with huge volumes. Besides, different concentration methods could get different viral catalogs and thus multiple methods should be combined to get the whole picture of viruses in the system. In addition, geNomad was the most recommended identification tool for viruses in the present study and the long-read sequencing could improve the assembly statistics of viruses when compared with the short-read sequencing. For the 8192 viral operational taxonomic units in this study, 95.1 % of them were phages and belonged to the same lineage at the order level of Caudovirales. Virulent phages dominated the AS system and Pseudomonadota were the main host. Taken together, this study provides new insights into methods selection for virus research of AS.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofScience of The Total Environment-
dc.subjectActivated sludge-
dc.subjectFlocculation filtration and resuspension-
dc.subjectPhages-
dc.subjectTangential flow filtration-
dc.subjectVirus-
dc.subjectWastewater treatment plants-
dc.titleMethod evaluation for viruses in activated sludge: Concentration, sequencing, and identification -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176886-
dc.identifier.pmid39419205-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85206991650-
dc.identifier.volume955-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026-
dc.identifier.issnl0048-9697-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats