File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Closed-loop versus open-loop “remind-to-move” treatment using wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients after stroke: A proof-of-concept study

TitleClosed-loop versus open-loop “remind-to-move” treatment using wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients after stroke: A proof-of-concept study
Authors
Keywordsclosed-loop
learned nonuse
open-loop
stroke
upper limb
wearables
Issue Date17-Jul-2025
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Wearable Technologies, 2025, v. 6 How to Cite?
Abstract

This is a proof-of-concept study to compare the effects of a 2-week program of “Remind-to-move” (RTM) treatment using closed-loop and open-loop wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with chronic stroke in the community. The RTM open-loop wearable device has been proven in our previous studies to be useful to address the learned nonuse phenomenon of the hemiparetic upper extremity. A closed-loop RTM wearable device, which emits reminding cues according to actual arm use, was developed in this study. A convenience sample of 16 participants with chronic unilateral stroke recruited in the community was engaged in repetitive upper extremity task-specific practice for 2 weeks while wearing either a closed-loop or an open-loop ambulatory RTM wearable device on their affected hand for 3 hrs a day. Evaluations were conducted at pre-/post-intervention and follow-up after 4 weeks using upper extremity motor performance behavioral measures, actual arm use questionnaire, and the kinematic data obtained from the device. Results showed that both open-loop and closed-loop training groups achieved significant gains in all measures at posttest and follow-up evaluations. The closed-loop group showed a more significant improvement in movement frequency, hand functions, and actual arm use than did the open-loop group. Our findings supported the use of closed-loop wearables, which showed greater effects in terms of promoting the hand use of the hemiparetic upper extremity than open-loop wearables among patients with chronic stroke.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362181

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFong, Kenneth N.K.-
dc.contributor.authorPak, Jasmine P.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Alissa H.L.-
dc.contributor.authorSzeto, Maggie M.K.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Natalie M.T.-
dc.contributor.authorYau, Keily K.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorToh, Sharon F.M.-
dc.contributor.authorLou, Vivian W.-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, Hector W.H.-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Gary K.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-19T00:33:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-19T00:33:35Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-17-
dc.identifier.citationWearable Technologies, 2025, v. 6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362181-
dc.description.abstract<p>This is a proof-of-concept study to compare the effects of a 2-week program of “Remind-to-move” (RTM) treatment using closed-loop and open-loop wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with chronic stroke in the community. The RTM open-loop wearable device has been proven in our previous studies to be useful to address the learned nonuse phenomenon of the hemiparetic upper extremity. A closed-loop RTM wearable device, which emits reminding cues according to actual arm use, was developed in this study. A convenience sample of 16 participants with chronic unilateral stroke recruited in the community was engaged in repetitive upper extremity task-specific practice for 2 weeks while wearing either a closed-loop or an open-loop ambulatory RTM wearable device on their affected hand for 3 hrs a day. Evaluations were conducted at pre-/post-intervention and follow-up after 4 weeks using upper extremity motor performance behavioral measures, actual arm use questionnaire, and the kinematic data obtained from the device. Results showed that both open-loop and closed-loop training groups achieved significant gains in all measures at posttest and follow-up evaluations. The closed-loop group showed a more significant improvement in movement frequency, hand functions, and actual arm use than did the open-loop group. Our findings supported the use of closed-loop wearables, which showed greater effects in terms of promoting the hand use of the hemiparetic upper extremity than open-loop wearables among patients with chronic stroke.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofWearable Technologies-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectclosed-loop-
dc.subjectlearned nonuse-
dc.subjectopen-loop-
dc.subjectstroke-
dc.subjectupper limb-
dc.subjectwearables-
dc.titleClosed-loop versus open-loop “remind-to-move” treatment using wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients after stroke: A proof-of-concept study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/wtc.2025.10017-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105011062756-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.eissn2631-7176-
dc.identifier.issnl2631-7176-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats