File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/wtc.2025.10017
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105011062756
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Closed-loop versus open-loop “remind-to-move” treatment using wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients after stroke: A proof-of-concept study
| Title | Closed-loop versus open-loop “remind-to-move” treatment using wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients after stroke: A proof-of-concept study |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | closed-loop learned nonuse open-loop stroke upper limb wearables |
| Issue Date | 17-Jul-2025 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Citation | Wearable Technologies, 2025, v. 6 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This is a proof-of-concept study to compare the effects of a 2-week program of “Remind-to-move” (RTM) treatment using closed-loop and open-loop wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with chronic stroke in the community. The RTM open-loop wearable device has been proven in our previous studies to be useful to address the learned nonuse phenomenon of the hemiparetic upper extremity. A closed-loop RTM wearable device, which emits reminding cues according to actual arm use, was developed in this study. A convenience sample of 16 participants with chronic unilateral stroke recruited in the community was engaged in repetitive upper extremity task-specific practice for 2 weeks while wearing either a closed-loop or an open-loop ambulatory RTM wearable device on their affected hand for 3 hrs a day. Evaluations were conducted at pre-/post-intervention and follow-up after 4 weeks using upper extremity motor performance behavioral measures, actual arm use questionnaire, and the kinematic data obtained from the device. Results showed that both open-loop and closed-loop training groups achieved significant gains in all measures at posttest and follow-up evaluations. The closed-loop group showed a more significant improvement in movement frequency, hand functions, and actual arm use than did the open-loop group. Our findings supported the use of closed-loop wearables, which showed greater effects in terms of promoting the hand use of the hemiparetic upper extremity than open-loop wearables among patients with chronic stroke. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362181 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Fong, Kenneth N.K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pak, Jasmine P.Y. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Koo, Alissa H.L. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Szeto, Maggie M.K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wong, Natalie M.T. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yau, Keily K.Y. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Toh, Sharon F.M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lou, Vivian W. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsang, Hector W.H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lau, Gary K.K. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-19T00:33:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-19T00:33:35Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-07-17 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Wearable Technologies, 2025, v. 6 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362181 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>This is a proof-of-concept study to compare the effects of a 2-week program of “Remind-to-move” (RTM) treatment using closed-loop and open-loop wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients with chronic stroke in the community. The RTM open-loop wearable device has been proven in our previous studies to be useful to address the learned nonuse phenomenon of the hemiparetic upper extremity. A closed-loop RTM wearable device, which emits reminding cues according to actual arm use, was developed in this study. A convenience sample of 16 participants with chronic unilateral stroke recruited in the community was engaged in repetitive upper extremity task-specific practice for 2 weeks while wearing either a closed-loop or an open-loop ambulatory RTM wearable device on their affected hand for 3 hrs a day. Evaluations were conducted at pre-/post-intervention and follow-up after 4 weeks using upper extremity motor performance behavioral measures, actual arm use questionnaire, and the kinematic data obtained from the device. Results showed that both open-loop and closed-loop training groups achieved significant gains in all measures at posttest and follow-up evaluations. The closed-loop group showed a more significant improvement in movement frequency, hand functions, and actual arm use than did the open-loop group. Our findings supported the use of closed-loop wearables, which showed greater effects in terms of promoting the hand use of the hemiparetic upper extremity than open-loop wearables among patients with chronic stroke.<br></p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Wearable Technologies | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | closed-loop | - |
| dc.subject | learned nonuse | - |
| dc.subject | open-loop | - |
| dc.subject | stroke | - |
| dc.subject | upper limb | - |
| dc.subject | wearables | - |
| dc.title | Closed-loop versus open-loop “remind-to-move” treatment using wearables for hemiparetic upper extremity in patients after stroke: A proof-of-concept study | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/wtc.2025.10017 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105011062756 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 6 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2631-7176 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 2631-7176 | - |
