File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Factors Influencing Initial Rehabilitation Type after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

TitleFactors Influencing Initial Rehabilitation Type after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Authors
Keywordship fracture
post-surgery
Rehabilitation
Issue Date1-May-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2025, v. 26, n. 5 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective: To describe and compare the factors that impact initial rehabilitation type after hip fracture surgery. Design: Retrospective population-based cohort study. Setting and Participants: People aged between 50 and 105 with a hip fracture who had a surgical repair in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Methods: Descriptive statistics and a multinomial logistic regression model were used to identify factors associated with initial rehabilitation type. Results: In this study, 63,401 individuals were included with a mean age of 80 years [standard deviation (SD) 10.9], mostly female (67.3%), with 86.3% living in urban areas at the time of hospitalization and most (72.6%) admitted from the community without home care. A total of 24.5% of individuals did not receive any form of rehabilitation. Rurality of residence decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in complex continuing care [odds ratio (OR), 0.23; 95% CI, 0.21–0.26], in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.24–0.28), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50–0.58) compared with no rehabilitation. Dementia decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in complex continuing care (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81), in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.41–0.47), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82–0.95) compared with receiving no rehabilitation. Previous history of fragility fracture decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in either complex continuing care (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.27–0.34), in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.24–0.29), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.30–0.37) compared with no rehabilitation. Conclusions and Implications: Rurality of residence, dementia, and previous history of fragility fractures reduced the odds of receiving specialized inpatient rehabilitation and increased the odds of receiving no rehabilitation. Future research should focus on achieving more equitable care for individuals living in rural settings, with dementia, or with previous fragility fractures to enhance the quality of care and achieve best outcomes for the overall hip fracture population.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362017
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.592

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBackman, Chantal-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Wenshan-
dc.contributor.authorShah, Soha-
dc.contributor.authorPapp, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorFung, Stephen G-
dc.contributor.authorDumicho, Asnake Yohannes-
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Meltem-
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Franciely Daiana-
dc.contributor.authorWebber, Colleen-
dc.contributor.authorTurcotte, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorMcIsaac, Daniel I-
dc.contributor.authorBeaulé, Paul E-
dc.contributor.authorFrench-Merkley, Véronique-
dc.contributor.authorPoitras, Stéphane-
dc.contributor.authorLafleur, Benoit-
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Jennifer-
dc.contributor.authorVincent, Corita-
dc.contributor.authorStraus, Sharon-
dc.contributor.authorTran, Alexandre-
dc.contributor.authorPitzul, Kristen-
dc.contributor.authorGuilcher, Sara JT-
dc.contributor.authorSenthinathan, Arrani-
dc.contributor.authorTanuseputro, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-18T00:36:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-18T00:36:26Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2025, v. 26, n. 5-
dc.identifier.issn1525-8610-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362017-
dc.description.abstract<p>Objective: To describe and compare the factors that impact initial rehabilitation type after hip fracture surgery. Design: Retrospective population-based cohort study. Setting and Participants: People aged between 50 and 105 with a hip fracture who had a surgical repair in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Methods: Descriptive statistics and a multinomial logistic regression model were used to identify factors associated with initial rehabilitation type. Results: In this study, 63,401 individuals were included with a mean age of 80 years [standard deviation (SD) 10.9], mostly female (67.3%), with 86.3% living in urban areas at the time of hospitalization and most (72.6%) admitted from the community without home care. A total of 24.5% of individuals did not receive any form of rehabilitation. Rurality of residence decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in complex continuing care [odds ratio (OR), 0.23; 95% CI, 0.21–0.26], in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.24–0.28), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50–0.58) compared with no rehabilitation. Dementia decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in complex continuing care (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81), in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.41–0.47), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82–0.95) compared with receiving no rehabilitation. Previous history of fragility fracture decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in either complex continuing care (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.27–0.34), in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.24–0.29), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.30–0.37) compared with no rehabilitation. Conclusions and Implications: Rurality of residence, dementia, and previous history of fragility fractures reduced the odds of receiving specialized inpatient rehabilitation and increased the odds of receiving no rehabilitation. Future research should focus on achieving more equitable care for individuals living in rural settings, with dementia, or with previous fragility fractures to enhance the quality of care and achieve best outcomes for the overall hip fracture population.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Medical Directors Association-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjecthip fracture-
dc.subjectpost-surgery-
dc.subjectRehabilitation-
dc.titleFactors Influencing Initial Rehabilitation Type after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105521-
dc.identifier.pmid40020754-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105000452590-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.issnl1525-8610-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats