File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.054
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85121985347
- PMID: 34953923
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
| Title | The lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Case fatality Lethality Methods Suicide Suicide prevention |
| Issue Date | 2022 |
| Citation | Journal of Affective Disorders, 2022, v. 300, p. 121-129 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: The use of suicide methods largely determines the outcome of suicide acts. However, no existing meta-analysis has assessed the case fatality rates (CFRs) by different suicide methods. The current study aimed to fill this gap. Methods: We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest and Embase for studies reporting method-specific CFRs in suicide, published from inception to 31 December 2020. A random-effect model meta-analysis was applied to compute pooled estimates. Results: Of 10,708 studies screened, 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the suicide acts that resulted in death or hospitalization, firearms were found to be the most lethal method (CFR:89.7%), followed by hanging/suffocation (84.5%), drowning (80.4%), gas poisoning (56.6%), jumping (46.7%), drug/liquid poisoning (8.0%) and cutting (4.0%). The rank of the lethality for different methods remained relatively stable across study setting, sex and age group. Method-specific CFRs for males and females were similar for most suicide methods, while method-CFRs were specifically higher in older adults. Conclusions: This study is the first meta-analysis that provides significant evidence for the wide variation of the lethality of suicide methods. Restricting highly lethal methods based on local context is vital in suicide prevention. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361634 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.082 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cai, Ziyi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Junus, Alvin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chang, Qingsong | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yip, Paul S.F. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:18:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:18:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Affective Disorders, 2022, v. 300, p. 121-129 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0165-0327 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361634 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The use of suicide methods largely determines the outcome of suicide acts. However, no existing meta-analysis has assessed the case fatality rates (CFRs) by different suicide methods. The current study aimed to fill this gap. Methods: We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest and Embase for studies reporting method-specific CFRs in suicide, published from inception to 31 December 2020. A random-effect model meta-analysis was applied to compute pooled estimates. Results: Of 10,708 studies screened, 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the suicide acts that resulted in death or hospitalization, firearms were found to be the most lethal method (CFR:89.7%), followed by hanging/suffocation (84.5%), drowning (80.4%), gas poisoning (56.6%), jumping (46.7%), drug/liquid poisoning (8.0%) and cutting (4.0%). The rank of the lethality for different methods remained relatively stable across study setting, sex and age group. Method-specific CFRs for males and females were similar for most suicide methods, while method-CFRs were specifically higher in older adults. Conclusions: This study is the first meta-analysis that provides significant evidence for the wide variation of the lethality of suicide methods. Restricting highly lethal methods based on local context is vital in suicide prevention. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Affective Disorders | - |
| dc.subject | Case fatality | - |
| dc.subject | Lethality | - |
| dc.subject | Methods | - |
| dc.subject | Suicide | - |
| dc.subject | Suicide prevention | - |
| dc.title | The lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.054 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 34953923 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85121985347 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 300 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 121 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 129 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-2517 | - |
