File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleThe lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsCase fatality
Lethality
Methods
Suicide
Suicide prevention
Issue Date2022
Citation
Journal of Affective Disorders, 2022, v. 300, p. 121-129 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The use of suicide methods largely determines the outcome of suicide acts. However, no existing meta-analysis has assessed the case fatality rates (CFRs) by different suicide methods. The current study aimed to fill this gap. Methods: We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest and Embase for studies reporting method-specific CFRs in suicide, published from inception to 31 December 2020. A random-effect model meta-analysis was applied to compute pooled estimates. Results: Of 10,708 studies screened, 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the suicide acts that resulted in death or hospitalization, firearms were found to be the most lethal method (CFR:89.7%), followed by hanging/suffocation (84.5%), drowning (80.4%), gas poisoning (56.6%), jumping (46.7%), drug/liquid poisoning (8.0%) and cutting (4.0%). The rank of the lethality for different methods remained relatively stable across study setting, sex and age group. Method-specific CFRs for males and females were similar for most suicide methods, while method-CFRs were specifically higher in older adults. Conclusions: This study is the first meta-analysis that provides significant evidence for the wide variation of the lethality of suicide methods. Restricting highly lethal methods based on local context is vital in suicide prevention.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361634
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.082

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCai, Ziyi-
dc.contributor.authorJunus, Alvin-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Qingsong-
dc.contributor.authorYip, Paul S.F.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:18:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:18:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Affective Disorders, 2022, v. 300, p. 121-129-
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361634-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The use of suicide methods largely determines the outcome of suicide acts. However, no existing meta-analysis has assessed the case fatality rates (CFRs) by different suicide methods. The current study aimed to fill this gap. Methods: We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest and Embase for studies reporting method-specific CFRs in suicide, published from inception to 31 December 2020. A random-effect model meta-analysis was applied to compute pooled estimates. Results: Of 10,708 studies screened, 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the suicide acts that resulted in death or hospitalization, firearms were found to be the most lethal method (CFR:89.7%), followed by hanging/suffocation (84.5%), drowning (80.4%), gas poisoning (56.6%), jumping (46.7%), drug/liquid poisoning (8.0%) and cutting (4.0%). The rank of the lethality for different methods remained relatively stable across study setting, sex and age group. Method-specific CFRs for males and females were similar for most suicide methods, while method-CFRs were specifically higher in older adults. Conclusions: This study is the first meta-analysis that provides significant evidence for the wide variation of the lethality of suicide methods. Restricting highly lethal methods based on local context is vital in suicide prevention.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Affective Disorders-
dc.subjectCase fatality-
dc.subjectLethality-
dc.subjectMethods-
dc.subjectSuicide-
dc.subjectSuicide prevention-
dc.titleThe lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.054-
dc.identifier.pmid34953923-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85121985347-
dc.identifier.volume300-
dc.identifier.spage121-
dc.identifier.epage129-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-2517-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats