File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfe5e
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85113575916
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Kilonova Emission from Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers. II. Luminosity Function and Implications for Target-of-opportunity Observations of Gravitational-wave Triggers and Blind Searches
| Title | Kilonova Emission from Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers. II. Luminosity Function and Implications for Target-of-opportunity Observations of Gravitational-wave Triggers and Blind Searches |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2021 |
| Citation | Astrophysical Journal, 2021, v. 917, n. 1, article no. 24 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | We present detailed simulations of the kilonova and gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow and kilonova luminosity function from black hole-neutron star (BH-NS) mergers, and discuss the detectability of an electromagnetic (EM) counterpart in connection with gravitational wave (GW) detections, GW-triggered target-of-opportunity observations, and time-domain blind searches. The predicted absolute magnitude of BH-NS kilonovae at 0.5 days after the merger falls in the range [-10, -15.5]. The simulated luminosity function contains potential information on the viewing-angle distribution of the anisotropic kilonova emission. We simulate the GW detection rates, detectable distances, and signal duration for future networks of 2nd/2.5th/3rd generation GW detectors. BH-NSs tend to produce brighter kilonovae and afterglows if the BH has a higher aligned spin, and a less massive NS with a stiffer equation of state. The detectability of kilonovae is especially sensitive to the BH spin. If BHs typically have low spins, the BH-NS EM counterparts are hard to discover. For 2nd generation GW detector networks, a limiting magnitude of m limit ∼ 23-24 mag is required to detect kilonovae even if high BH spin is assumed. Thus, a plausible explanation for the lack of BH-NS-associated kilonova detection during LIGO/Virgo O3 is that either there is no EM counterpart (plunging events) or the current follow-ups are too shallow. These observations still have the chance to detect the on-axis jet afterglow associated with a short GRB or an orphan afterglow. Follow-up observations can detect possible associated short GRB afterglows, from which kilonova signatures may be studied. For time-domain observations, a high-cadence search in redder filters is recommended to detect more BH-NS-associated kilonovae and afterglows. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361607 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.905 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zhu, Jin Ping | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wu, Shichao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang, Yuan Pei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Bing | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gao, He | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu, Yun Wei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Zhuo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cao, Zhoujian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, Liang Duan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Huang, Yan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Xing Han | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:18:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:18:08Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Astrophysical Journal, 2021, v. 917, n. 1, article no. 24 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0004-637X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361607 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | We present detailed simulations of the kilonova and gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow and kilonova luminosity function from black hole-neutron star (BH-NS) mergers, and discuss the detectability of an electromagnetic (EM) counterpart in connection with gravitational wave (GW) detections, GW-triggered target-of-opportunity observations, and time-domain blind searches. The predicted absolute magnitude of BH-NS kilonovae at 0.5 days after the merger falls in the range [-10, -15.5]. The simulated luminosity function contains potential information on the viewing-angle distribution of the anisotropic kilonova emission. We simulate the GW detection rates, detectable distances, and signal duration for future networks of 2nd/2.5th/3rd generation GW detectors. BH-NSs tend to produce brighter kilonovae and afterglows if the BH has a higher aligned spin, and a less massive NS with a stiffer equation of state. The detectability of kilonovae is especially sensitive to the BH spin. If BHs typically have low spins, the BH-NS EM counterparts are hard to discover. For 2nd generation GW detector networks, a limiting magnitude of m limit ∼ 23-24 mag is required to detect kilonovae even if high BH spin is assumed. Thus, a plausible explanation for the lack of BH-NS-associated kilonova detection during LIGO/Virgo O3 is that either there is no EM counterpart (plunging events) or the current follow-ups are too shallow. These observations still have the chance to detect the on-axis jet afterglow associated with a short GRB or an orphan afterglow. Follow-up observations can detect possible associated short GRB afterglows, from which kilonova signatures may be studied. For time-domain observations, a high-cadence search in redder filters is recommended to detect more BH-NS-associated kilonovae and afterglows. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Astrophysical Journal | - |
| dc.title | Kilonova Emission from Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers. II. Luminosity Function and Implications for Target-of-opportunity Observations of Gravitational-wave Triggers and Blind Searches | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3847/1538-4357/abfe5e | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85113575916 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 917 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 24 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 24 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1538-4357 | - |
