File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1142/9789813226609_0375
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85059086651
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: GRB 130831a: Rise and demise of a magnetar at z = 0.5
| Title | GRB 130831a: Rise and demise of a magnetar at z = 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Authors | De Pasquale, MassimilianoPage, Mathew J.Zane, SilviaBreeveld, Alice A.Oates, Samantha R.Castro-Tirado, Alberto J.Gorosabel, JavierRacusin, Judith L.Troja, EleonoraCucchiara, AntoninoLien, AmyGehrels, NeilMoseley, HarveyKutyrev, AlexanderKann, David A.Zhang, BingPozanenko, AlexeiVolnova, Alina A.Trotter, AdamFrank, NathanReichart, Daniel E.Haislip, Joshua B.Sbarufatti, BorisButler, NathanielLittlejohns, OwenSchulze, SteveCano, ZachFox, OriBloom, JoshuaProchaska, Jason X.De Diego, José A.Gonzalez, JesúsWatson, Alan M.Richer, Michael G.Román-Zúñiga, CarlosHoette, VivianRussell, Rebecca R.Rumyantsev, VasilijKlunko, EvgenyBurkhonov, Otabek |
| Keywords | Magnetar |
| Issue Date | 2018 |
| Citation | 14th Marcel Grossman Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories Proceedings, 2018, p. 2981-2988 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the brightest explosions in the universe, yet the properties of their energy sources are far from understood. Very important clues, however, can be deduced by studying the afterglows of these events. We present observations of GRB 130831A and its afterglow obtained with Swift, Chandra, and multiple ground-based observatories. This burst shows an uncommon drop in the X-ray light curve at about 100 ks after the trigger, with a decay slope of α 7. The standard Forward Shock (FS) model offers no explanation for such a behaviour. Instead, a model in which a newly born magnetar outflow powers the early X-ray emission is found to be viable. After the drop, the X-ray afterglow resumes its decay with a slope typical of FS emission. The optical emission, on the other hand, displays no clear break across the X-ray drop and its decay is consistent with that of the late X-rays. Using both the X-ray and optical data, we show that the FS model can explain the emission after 100 ks. We model our data to infer the kinetic energy of the ejecta and thus estimate the efficiency of a magnetar “central engine” of a GRB. Furthermore, we break down the energy budget of this GRB into prompt emission, late internal dissipation, kinetic energy of the relativistic ejecta, and compare it with the energy of the accompanying supernova, SN 2013fu. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361464 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | De Pasquale, Massimiliano | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Page, Mathew J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zane, Silvia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Breeveld, Alice A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Oates, Samantha R. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Castro-Tirado, Alberto J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gorosabel, Javier | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Racusin, Judith L. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Troja, Eleonora | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cucchiara, Antonino | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lien, Amy | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gehrels, Neil | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Moseley, Harvey | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kutyrev, Alexander | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kann, David A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Bing | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pozanenko, Alexei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Volnova, Alina A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Trotter, Adam | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Frank, Nathan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Reichart, Daniel E. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Haislip, Joshua B. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sbarufatti, Boris | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Butler, Nathaniel | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Littlejohns, Owen | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Schulze, Steve | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cano, Zach | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fox, Ori | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bloom, Joshua | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Prochaska, Jason X. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | De Diego, José A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gonzalez, Jesús | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Watson, Alan M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Richer, Michael G. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Román-Zúñiga, Carlos | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hoette, Vivian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Russell, Rebecca R. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Rumyantsev, Vasilij | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Klunko, Evgeny | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Burkhonov, Otabek | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:17:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:17:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 14th Marcel Grossman Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories Proceedings, 2018, p. 2981-2988 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361464 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the brightest explosions in the universe, yet the properties of their energy sources are far from understood. Very important clues, however, can be deduced by studying the afterglows of these events. We present observations of GRB 130831A and its afterglow obtained with Swift, Chandra, and multiple ground-based observatories. This burst shows an uncommon drop in the X-ray light curve at about 100 ks after the trigger, with a decay slope of α 7. The standard Forward Shock (FS) model offers no explanation for such a behaviour. Instead, a model in which a newly born magnetar outflow powers the early X-ray emission is found to be viable. After the drop, the X-ray afterglow resumes its decay with a slope typical of FS emission. The optical emission, on the other hand, displays no clear break across the X-ray drop and its decay is consistent with that of the late X-rays. Using both the X-ray and optical data, we show that the FS model can explain the emission after 100 ks. We model our data to infer the kinetic energy of the ejecta and thus estimate the efficiency of a magnetar “central engine” of a GRB. Furthermore, we break down the energy budget of this GRB into prompt emission, late internal dissipation, kinetic energy of the relativistic ejecta, and compare it with the energy of the accompanying supernova, SN 2013fu. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 14th Marcel Grossman Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories Proceedings | - |
| dc.subject | Magnetar | - |
| dc.title | GRB 130831a: Rise and demise of a magnetar at z = 0.5 | - |
| dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1142/9789813226609_0375 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85059086651 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 2981 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 2988 | - |
