File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Gamma-Ray Burst/Supernova Associations: Energy Partition and the Case of a Magnetar Central Engine

TitleGamma-Ray Burst/Supernova Associations: Energy Partition and the Case of a Magnetar Central Engine
Authors
Keywordsgamma rays: general
methods: statistical
radiation mechanisms: non-thermal
Issue Date2018
Citation
Astrophysical Journal, 2018, v. 862, n. 2, article no. 130 How to Cite?
AbstractThe favored progenitor model for Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs) with Supernova (SN) association is the core collapse of massive stars. One possible outcome of such a collapse is a rapidly spinning, strongly magnetized neutron star ("magnetar"). We systematically analyze the multi-wavelength data of GRB/SN associations detected by several instruments before 2017 June. Twenty GRB/SN systems have been confirmed via direct spectroscopic evidence or a clear light curve bump, as well as some spectroscopic evidence resembling a GRB-SN. We derive/collect the basic physical parameters of the GRBs and the SNe, and look for correlations among these parameters. We find that the peak brightness, 56Ni mass, and explosion energy of SNe associated with GRBs are statistically higher than other Type Ib/c SNe. A statistically significant relation between the peak energy of GRBs and the peak brightness of their associated SNe is confirmed. No significant correlations are found between the GRB energies (either isotropic or beaming-corrected) and the supernova energy. We investigate the energy partition within these systems and find that the beaming-corrected GRB energy of most systems is smaller than the SN energy, with less than 30% of the total energy distributed in the relativistic jet. The total energy of the systems is typically smaller than the maximum available energy of a millisecond magnetar (2 × 1052 erg), especially if aspherical SN explosions are considered. The data are consistent with - although not proof of - the hypothesis that most, but not all, GRB/SN systems are powered by millisecond magnetars.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361445
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.905

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLü, Hou Jun-
dc.contributor.authorLan, Lin-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bing-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, En Wei-
dc.contributor.authorKann, David Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorDu, Shen Shi-
dc.contributor.authorShen, Jun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:17:05Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:17:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationAstrophysical Journal, 2018, v. 862, n. 2, article no. 130-
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361445-
dc.description.abstractThe favored progenitor model for Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs) with Supernova (SN) association is the core collapse of massive stars. One possible outcome of such a collapse is a rapidly spinning, strongly magnetized neutron star ("magnetar"). We systematically analyze the multi-wavelength data of GRB/SN associations detected by several instruments before 2017 June. Twenty GRB/SN systems have been confirmed via direct spectroscopic evidence or a clear light curve bump, as well as some spectroscopic evidence resembling a GRB-SN. We derive/collect the basic physical parameters of the GRBs and the SNe, and look for correlations among these parameters. We find that the peak brightness, <sup>56</sup>Ni mass, and explosion energy of SNe associated with GRBs are statistically higher than other Type Ib/c SNe. A statistically significant relation between the peak energy of GRBs and the peak brightness of their associated SNe is confirmed. No significant correlations are found between the GRB energies (either isotropic or beaming-corrected) and the supernova energy. We investigate the energy partition within these systems and find that the beaming-corrected GRB energy of most systems is smaller than the SN energy, with less than 30% of the total energy distributed in the relativistic jet. The total energy of the systems is typically smaller than the maximum available energy of a millisecond magnetar (2 × 10<sup>52</sup> erg), especially if aspherical SN explosions are considered. The data are consistent with - although not proof of - the hypothesis that most, but not all, GRB/SN systems are powered by millisecond magnetars.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAstrophysical Journal-
dc.subjectgamma rays: general-
dc.subjectmethods: statistical-
dc.subjectradiation mechanisms: non-thermal-
dc.titleGamma-Ray Burst/Supernova Associations: Energy Partition and the Case of a Magnetar Central Engine-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3847/1538-4357/aacd03-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85051523346-
dc.identifier.volume862-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 130-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 130-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-4357-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats