File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A CORRELATED STUDY OF OPTICAL AND X-RAY AFTERGLOWS OF GRBs

TitleA CORRELATED STUDY OF OPTICAL AND X-RAY AFTERGLOWS OF GRBs
Authors
Keywordsmethods: statistical
reference systems
X-rays: ISM
Issue Date2015
Citation
Astrophysical Journal, 2015, v. 805, n. 1, article no. 13 How to Cite?
AbstractWe study an extensive sample of 87 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) for which there are well-sampled and simultaneous optical and X-ray light curves. We extract the cleanest possible signal of the afterglow component and compare the temporal behaviors of the X-ray light curve, observed by Swift XRT, and optical data, observed by UVOT and ground-based telescopes for each individual burst. Overall we find that 62% of the GRBs are consistent with the standard afterglow model. When more advanced modeling is invoked, up to 91% of the bursts in our sample may be consistent with the external-shock model. A large fraction of these bursts are consistent with occurring in a constant interstellar density medium (61%) while only 39% of them occur in a wind-like medium. Only nine cases have afterglow light curves that exactly match the standard fireball model prediction, having a single power-law decay in both energy bands that are observed during their entire duration. In particular, for the bursts with chromatic behavior, additional model assumptions must be made over limited segments of the light curves in order for these bursts to fully agree with the external-shock model. Interestingly, for 54% of the X-ray and 40% of the optical band observations, the end of the shallow decay (t∼-0.5) period coincides with the jet-break (t∼-p) time, causing an abrupt change in decay slope. The fraction of the burst that is consistent with the external-shock model is independent of the observational epochs in the rest frame of GRBs. Moreover, no cases can be explained by the cooling frequency crossing the X-ray or optical band.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361305
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.905

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Liang-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Xue Feng-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yong Feng-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiang Gao-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Qing Wen-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Yun Feng-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bin Bin-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yu-
dc.contributor.authorGeng, Jin Jun-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, En Wei-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Jian Yan-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bing-
dc.contributor.authorRyde, Felix-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:16:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:16:02Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationAstrophysical Journal, 2015, v. 805, n. 1, article no. 13-
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361305-
dc.description.abstractWe study an extensive sample of 87 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) for which there are well-sampled and simultaneous optical and X-ray light curves. We extract the cleanest possible signal of the afterglow component and compare the temporal behaviors of the X-ray light curve, observed by Swift XRT, and optical data, observed by UVOT and ground-based telescopes for each individual burst. Overall we find that 62% of the GRBs are consistent with the standard afterglow model. When more advanced modeling is invoked, up to 91% of the bursts in our sample may be consistent with the external-shock model. A large fraction of these bursts are consistent with occurring in a constant interstellar density medium (61%) while only 39% of them occur in a wind-like medium. Only nine cases have afterglow light curves that exactly match the standard fireball model prediction, having a single power-law decay in both energy bands that are observed during their entire duration. In particular, for the bursts with chromatic behavior, additional model assumptions must be made over limited segments of the light curves in order for these bursts to fully agree with the external-shock model. Interestingly, for 54% of the X-ray and 40% of the optical band observations, the end of the shallow decay (t<sup>∼-0.5</sup>) period coincides with the jet-break (t<sup>∼-p</sup>) time, causing an abrupt change in decay slope. The fraction of the burst that is consistent with the external-shock model is independent of the observational epochs in the rest frame of GRBs. Moreover, no cases can be explained by the cooling frequency crossing the X-ray or optical band.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAstrophysical Journal-
dc.subjectmethods: statistical-
dc.subjectreference systems-
dc.subjectX-rays: ISM-
dc.titleA CORRELATED STUDY OF OPTICAL AND X-RAY AFTERGLOWS OF GRBs-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/13-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84930209910-
dc.identifier.volume805-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 13-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 13-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-4357-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats