File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Swift XRT observations of the afterglow of XRF 050416A

TitleSwift XRT observations of the afterglow of XRF 050416A
Authors
KeywordsGamma rays: bursts
X-rays: individual (XRF 050416A)
Issue Date2007
Citation
Astrophysical Journal, 2007, v. 654, n. 1 I, p. 403-412 How to Cite?
AbstractSwift discovered XRF 050416A with the Burst Alert Telescope and began observing it with its narrow-field instruments only 64.5 s after the burst onset. Its very soft spectrum classifies this event as an X-ray flash. The afterglow X-ray emission was monitored up to 74 days after the burst. The X-ray light curve initially decays very fast (decay slope α ∼ 2.4), subsequently flattens (α ∼ 0.44), and eventually steepens again (α ∼ 0.88), similar to many X-ray afterglows. The first and second phases end ∼ 172 and ∼ 1450 s after the burst onset, respectively. We find evidence of spectral evolution from a softer emission with photon index Γ ∼ 3.0 during the initial steep decay, to a harder emission with Γ ∼ 2.0 during the following evolutionary phases. The spectra show intrinsic absorption in the host galaxy with column density of ∼6.8 × 1021 cm-2. The consistency of the initial photon index with the high-energy BAT photon index suggests that the initial fast decaying phase of the X-ray light curve may be the low-energy tail of die prompt emission. The lack of jet break signatures in the X-ray afterglow light curve is not consistent with empirical relations between the source rest-frame peak energy and the collimation-corrected energy of the burst. The standard uniform jet model can give a possible description of the XRF 050416A X-ray afterglow for an opening angle larger than a few tens of degrees, although numerical simulations show that the late-time decay is slightly flatter than expected from on-axis viewing of a uniform jet. A structured Gaussian-type jet model with uniform Lorentz factor distribution and viewing angle outside the Gaussian core is another possibility, although a full agreement with data is not achieved with the numerical models explored. © 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361068
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.905

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMangano, Vanessa-
dc.contributor.authorLa Parola, Valentina-
dc.contributor.authorCusumano, Giancarlo-
dc.contributor.authorMineo, Teresa-
dc.contributor.authorMalesani, Daniele-
dc.contributor.authorDyks, Jaroslaw-
dc.contributor.authorCampana, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorCapalbi, Milvia-
dc.contributor.authorChincarini, Guido-
dc.contributor.authorGiommi, Paolo-
dc.contributor.authorMoretti, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorPerri, Matteo-
dc.contributor.authorRomano, Patrizia-
dc.contributor.authorTagliaferri, Gianpiero-
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, David N.-
dc.contributor.authorGehrels, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorGodet, Olivier-
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Stephen T.-
dc.contributor.authorKennea, Jamie A.-
dc.contributor.authorPage, Kim L.-
dc.contributor.authorRacusin, Judith L.-
dc.contributor.authorRoming, Peter W.A.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bing-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:14:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:14:34Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationAstrophysical Journal, 2007, v. 654, n. 1 I, p. 403-412-
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361068-
dc.description.abstractSwift discovered XRF 050416A with the Burst Alert Telescope and began observing it with its narrow-field instruments only 64.5 s after the burst onset. Its very soft spectrum classifies this event as an X-ray flash. The afterglow X-ray emission was monitored up to 74 days after the burst. The X-ray light curve initially decays very fast (decay slope α ∼ 2.4), subsequently flattens (α ∼ 0.44), and eventually steepens again (α ∼ 0.88), similar to many X-ray afterglows. The first and second phases end ∼ 172 and ∼ 1450 s after the burst onset, respectively. We find evidence of spectral evolution from a softer emission with photon index Γ ∼ 3.0 during the initial steep decay, to a harder emission with Γ ∼ 2.0 during the following evolutionary phases. The spectra show intrinsic absorption in the host galaxy with column density of ∼6.8 × 10<sup>21</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup>. The consistency of the initial photon index with the high-energy BAT photon index suggests that the initial fast decaying phase of the X-ray light curve may be the low-energy tail of die prompt emission. The lack of jet break signatures in the X-ray afterglow light curve is not consistent with empirical relations between the source rest-frame peak energy and the collimation-corrected energy of the burst. The standard uniform jet model can give a possible description of the XRF 050416A X-ray afterglow for an opening angle larger than a few tens of degrees, although numerical simulations show that the late-time decay is slightly flatter than expected from on-axis viewing of a uniform jet. A structured Gaussian-type jet model with uniform Lorentz factor distribution and viewing angle outside the Gaussian core is another possibility, although a full agreement with data is not achieved with the numerical models explored. © 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAstrophysical Journal-
dc.subjectGamma rays: bursts-
dc.subjectX-rays: individual (XRF 050416A)-
dc.titleSwift XRT observations of the afterglow of XRF 050416A-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/509100-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33846487947-
dc.identifier.volume654-
dc.identifier.issue1 I-
dc.identifier.spage403-
dc.identifier.epage412-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-4357-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats