File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1086/499292
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33644782210
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Swift XRT observations of the afterglow of GRB 050319
| Title | Swift XRT observations of the afterglow of GRB 050319 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cusumano, GiancarloMangano, VanessaAngelini, LorellaBarthelmy, ScottBeardmore, Andrew P.Burrows, David N.Campana, SergioCannizzo, John K.Capalbi, MilviaChincarini, GuidoGehrels, NeilGiommi, PaoloGoad, Michael R.Hill, Joanne E.Kennea, Jamie A.Kobayashi, ShihoParola, Valentina L.A.Malesani, DanieleMészáros, PeterMineo, TeresaMoretti, AlbertoNousek, John A.O'Brien, Paul T.Osborne, Julian P.Pagani, ClaudioPage, Kim L.Perri, MatteoRomano, PatriziaTagliaferri, GianpieroZhang, Bing |
| Keywords | Gamma rays: bursts X-rays: individual (GRB 050319) |
| Issue Date | 2006 |
| Citation | Astrophysical Journal, 2006, v. 639, n. 1 I, p. 316-322 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Swift discovered the high-redshift GRB 050319 with the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and began observing with its narrow-field instruments only 225 s after the burst onset. The afterglow X-ray emission was monitored by the XRT up to 28 days after the burst. The light curve shows a decay with three different phases, each characterized by a distinct slope: an initial steep decay with a power-law index of ∼5.5, a second phase characterized by a flat decay slope of ∼0.54, and a third phase with a decay slope of ∼1.14. During the first phase the spectral energy distribution is softer than in the following two phases, and the photon index is consistent with the GRB prompt spectrum. The extrapolation of the BAT light curve to the XRT band suggests that the initial fast-decaying phase of the XRT afterglow might be the low-energy tail of the prompt emission. The second break in the afterglow light curve occurs about 27,000 s after the burst. The spectral energy distribution before and after the second break does not change, and it can be tentatively interpreted as a jet break or the end of a delayed or continuous energy injection phase. © 2006. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361017 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.905 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cusumano, Giancarlo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mangano, Vanessa | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Angelini, Lorella | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Barthelmy, Scott | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Beardmore, Andrew P. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Burrows, David N. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Campana, Sergio | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cannizzo, John K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Capalbi, Milvia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chincarini, Guido | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gehrels, Neil | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Giommi, Paolo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Goad, Michael R. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hill, Joanne E. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kennea, Jamie A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kobayashi, Shiho | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Parola, Valentina L.A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Malesani, Daniele | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mészáros, Peter | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mineo, Teresa | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Moretti, Alberto | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nousek, John A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Brien, Paul T. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Osborne, Julian P. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pagani, Claudio | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Page, Kim L. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Perri, Matteo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Romano, Patrizia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tagliaferri, Gianpiero | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Bing | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:14:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:14:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Astrophysical Journal, 2006, v. 639, n. 1 I, p. 316-322 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0004-637X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361017 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Swift discovered the high-redshift GRB 050319 with the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and began observing with its narrow-field instruments only 225 s after the burst onset. The afterglow X-ray emission was monitored by the XRT up to 28 days after the burst. The light curve shows a decay with three different phases, each characterized by a distinct slope: an initial steep decay with a power-law index of ∼5.5, a second phase characterized by a flat decay slope of ∼0.54, and a third phase with a decay slope of ∼1.14. During the first phase the spectral energy distribution is softer than in the following two phases, and the photon index is consistent with the GRB prompt spectrum. The extrapolation of the BAT light curve to the XRT band suggests that the initial fast-decaying phase of the XRT afterglow might be the low-energy tail of the prompt emission. The second break in the afterglow light curve occurs about 27,000 s after the burst. The spectral energy distribution before and after the second break does not change, and it can be tentatively interpreted as a jet break or the end of a delayed or continuous energy injection phase. © 2006. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Astrophysical Journal | - |
| dc.subject | Gamma rays: bursts | - |
| dc.subject | X-rays: individual (GRB 050319) | - |
| dc.title | Swift XRT observations of the afterglow of GRB 050319 | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/499292 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33644782210 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 639 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 I | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 316 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 322 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1538-4357 | - |
