File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Swift observations of the X-ray - Bright GRB 050315

TitleSwift observations of the X-ray - Bright GRB 050315
Authors
KeywordsGamma rays: bursts
X-rays: individual (GRB 050315)
Issue Date2006
Citation
Astrophysical Journal, 2006, v. 638, n. 2 I, p. 920-929 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper discusses Swift observations of the γ-ray burst GRB 050315 (z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t-5) for ∼200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/γ-ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first ∼300 s of X-ray emission (observed by the XRT) can be explained by exponential decays, with similar decay constants. Extrapolating the BAT light curve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading prompt emission; this strong similarity between the prompt γ-ray and early X-ray emission may be related to the simple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray - rich GRB. The prompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to ∼15 keV and appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for ∼1.2 × 104 s, after which time it decayed with a temporal index of α ≈ 0.7, followed by a second break at ∼2.5 × 105 s to a slope of α ∼ 2. The apparent "plateau" in the X-ray light curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening angle was θ0 ∼ 5°, implying Eγ ≳ 1050 ergs. © 2006. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361015
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.905

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, S.-
dc.contributor.authorGoad, M. R.-
dc.contributor.authorBeardmore, A. P.-
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, P. T.-
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, J. P.-
dc.contributor.authorPage, K. L.-
dc.contributor.authorBarthelmy, S. D.-
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, D. N.-
dc.contributor.authorCampana, S.-
dc.contributor.authorCannizzo, J. K.-
dc.contributor.authorCapalbi, M.-
dc.contributor.authorChincarini, G.-
dc.contributor.authorCummings, J. R.-
dc.contributor.authorCusumano, G.-
dc.contributor.authorGiommi, P.-
dc.contributor.authorGodet, O.-
dc.contributor.authorHill, J. E.-
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, P.-
dc.contributor.authorLa Parola, V.-
dc.contributor.authorLevan, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMangano, V.-
dc.contributor.authorMészáros, P.-
dc.contributor.authorMoretti, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, D. C.-
dc.contributor.authorNousek, J. A.-
dc.contributor.authorPagani, C.-
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, D. M.-
dc.contributor.authorRacusin, J. L.-
dc.contributor.authorRomano, P.-
dc.contributor.authorTagliaferri, G.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, B.-
dc.contributor.authorGehrels, N.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:14:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:14:17Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationAstrophysical Journal, 2006, v. 638, n. 2 I, p. 920-929-
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361015-
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses Swift observations of the γ-ray burst GRB 050315 (z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t<sup>-5</sup>) for ∼200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/γ-ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first ∼300 s of X-ray emission (observed by the XRT) can be explained by exponential decays, with similar decay constants. Extrapolating the BAT light curve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading prompt emission; this strong similarity between the prompt γ-ray and early X-ray emission may be related to the simple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray - rich GRB. The prompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to ∼15 keV and appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for ∼1.2 × 10<sup>4</sup> s, after which time it decayed with a temporal index of α ≈ 0.7, followed by a second break at ∼2.5 × 10<sup>5</sup> s to a slope of α ∼ 2. The apparent "plateau" in the X-ray light curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening angle was θ<inf>0</inf> ∼ 5°, implying Eγ ≳ 10<sup>50</sup> ergs. © 2006. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAstrophysical Journal-
dc.subjectGamma rays: bursts-
dc.subjectX-rays: individual (GRB 050315)-
dc.titleSwift observations of the X-ray - Bright GRB 050315-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/499069-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33644764906-
dc.identifier.volume638-
dc.identifier.issue2 I-
dc.identifier.spage920-
dc.identifier.epage929-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-4357-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats