File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1086/432567
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-27744593014
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Variabilities of gamma-ray burst afterglows: Long-acting engine, anisotropic jet, or many fluctuating regions?
| Title | Variabilities of gamma-ray burst afterglows: Long-acting engine, anisotropic jet, or many fluctuating regions? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2005 |
| Citation | Astrophysical Journal, 2005, v. 631, n. 1 I, p. 429-434 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | We show that simple kinematic arguments can give limits on the timescale and amplitude of variabilities in gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows, especially when the variability timescale is shorter than the observed time since the burst, δt < t. These limits help us to identify the sources of afterglow variability. The afterglows of GRB 011211 and GRB 021004 marginally violate these limits. If such violation is confirmed by the Swift satellite, a possible explanation is that (1) the compact objects that power GRB jets continue to eject an intermittent outflow for a very long timescale (≳ 1 day), (2) the GRB jet from the central engine has a temporal anisotropy with a large brightness contrast ≳ 10 and small angular structure ≲ 10 -2, or (3) many (≳ 103) regions fluctuate simultaneously in the emitting site. © 2005. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361003 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.905 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ioka, Kunihito | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kobayashi, Shiho | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Bing | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:14:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:14:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Astrophysical Journal, 2005, v. 631, n. 1 I, p. 429-434 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0004-637X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361003 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | We show that simple kinematic arguments can give limits on the timescale and amplitude of variabilities in gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows, especially when the variability timescale is shorter than the observed time since the burst, δt < t. These limits help us to identify the sources of afterglow variability. The afterglows of GRB 011211 and GRB 021004 marginally violate these limits. If such violation is confirmed by the Swift satellite, a possible explanation is that (1) the compact objects that power GRB jets continue to eject an intermittent outflow for a very long timescale (≳ 1 day), (2) the GRB jet from the central engine has a temporal anisotropy with a large brightness contrast ≳ 10 and small angular structure ≲ 10 <sup>-2</sup>, or (3) many (≳ 10<sup>3</sup>) regions fluctuate simultaneously in the emitting site. © 2005. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Astrophysical Journal | - |
| dc.title | Variabilities of gamma-ray burst afterglows: Long-acting engine, anisotropic jet, or many fluctuating regions? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/432567 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-27744593014 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 631 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 I | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 429 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 434 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1538-4357 | - |
