File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Insights into the Energy Storage Differences of Zinc and Calcium Ions with Layered Vanadium Oxide as a Model Material

TitleInsights into the Energy Storage Differences of Zinc and Calcium Ions with Layered Vanadium Oxide as a Model Material
Authors
Keywordsaqueous batteries
calcium ion batteries
multivalent ion batteries
vanadium-based materials
zinc ion batteries
Issue Date2023
Citation
Advanced Energy Materials, 2023, v. 13, n. 41, article no. 2302683 How to Cite?
AbstractMultivalent ion batteries (e.g., Zn2+, Ca2+) are gaining great attention owing to their potentially high capacity, cheap cost, and good safety. However, significant disparities exist in achieved capacity, voltage, and kinetic performance within zinc and calcium ion electrolytes. Herein, the electrochemical and kinetic properties of Zn2+ and Ca2+ in aqueous electrolytes are investigated using a single-crystal V2O5 (V2O5·Pyridine, PVO) model material with stable large interlayer spacing. It is found that the discharge-specific capacity in 1 m Zn(ClO4)2 aqueous solution is 247.3 mAh g−1 at 0.3 A g−1, which is remarkably higher than 158.4 mAh g−1 in 1 m Ca(ClO4)2. Mechanistic studies show that in aqueous ZIB, H+ is intercalated first, followed by the generation of Zn4(OH)7ClO4, and finally H+ and Zn2+ are co-intercalated. But in aqueous CIB, H+ dominates the intercalation process. It is found that six times more Zn2+ than Ca2+ is intercalated into PVO, owing to its smaller radii and its relative higher intercalation potential (Zn2+ @-0.34 V, Ca2+ @-0.65 V vs. Ag/AgCl), giving it a higher specific capacity. Furthermore, density functional theory calculations demonstrate lower intercalation energies for Ca2+ (−6.67 eV) compared to Zn2+ (−1.85 eV), explaining the lower intercalation potential of Ca2+.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/360260
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 24.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 8.748

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chunfang-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jianchuan-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Shiwei-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Meilin-
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Fanbin-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Liming-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jiaqi-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Lan-
dc.contributor.authorLv, Haiming-
dc.contributor.authorZhi, Chunyi-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Cuiping-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T09:05:57Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-10T09:05:57Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAdvanced Energy Materials, 2023, v. 13, n. 41, article no. 2302683-
dc.identifier.issn1614-6832-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/360260-
dc.description.abstractMultivalent ion batteries (e.g., Zn<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>) are gaining great attention owing to their potentially high capacity, cheap cost, and good safety. However, significant disparities exist in achieved capacity, voltage, and kinetic performance within zinc and calcium ion electrolytes. Herein, the electrochemical and kinetic properties of Zn<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup> in aqueous electrolytes are investigated using a single-crystal V<inf>2</inf>O<inf>5</inf> (V<inf>2</inf>O<inf>5</inf>·Pyridine, PVO) model material with stable large interlayer spacing. It is found that the discharge-specific capacity in 1 m Zn(ClO<inf>4</inf>)<inf>2</inf> aqueous solution is 247.3 mAh g<sup>−1</sup> at 0.3 A g<sup>−1</sup>, which is remarkably higher than 158.4 mAh g<sup>−1</sup> in 1 m Ca(ClO<inf>4</inf>)<inf>2</inf>. Mechanistic studies show that in aqueous ZIB, H<sup>+</sup> is intercalated first, followed by the generation of Zn<inf>4</inf>(OH)<inf>7</inf>ClO<inf>4</inf>, and finally H<sup>+</sup> and Zn<sup>2+</sup> are co-intercalated. But in aqueous CIB, H<sup>+</sup> dominates the intercalation process. It is found that six times more Zn<sup>2+</sup> than Ca<sup>2+</sup> is intercalated into PVO, owing to its smaller radii and its relative higher intercalation potential (Zn<sup>2+</sup> @-0.34 V, Ca<sup>2+</sup> @-0.65 V vs. Ag/AgCl), giving it a higher specific capacity. Furthermore, density functional theory calculations demonstrate lower intercalation energies for Ca<sup>2+</sup> (−6.67 eV) compared to Zn<sup>2+</sup> (−1.85 eV), explaining the lower intercalation potential of Ca<sup>2+</sup>.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAdvanced Energy Materials-
dc.subjectaqueous batteries-
dc.subjectcalcium ion batteries-
dc.subjectmultivalent ion batteries-
dc.subjectvanadium-based materials-
dc.subjectzinc ion batteries-
dc.titleInsights into the Energy Storage Differences of Zinc and Calcium Ions with Layered Vanadium Oxide as a Model Material-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aenm.202302683-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85172022520-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue41-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 2302683-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 2302683-
dc.identifier.eissn1614-6840-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats