File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy

TitleWhich Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy
Authors
KeywordsChina
Confucianism
Electoral democracy
Human nature
Political culture
Political meritocracy
Issue Date1-Jun-2025
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Dao, 2025, v. 24, n. 2, p. 199-226 How to Cite?
AbstractWhich political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Zhang Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue. They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/359468
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.323

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBell, Daniel A.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Qianfan-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-07T00:30:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-07T00:30:34Z-
dc.date.issued2025-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationDao, 2025, v. 24, n. 2, p. 199-226-
dc.identifier.issn1540-3009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/359468-
dc.description.abstractWhich political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Zhang Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue. They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofDao-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectConfucianism-
dc.subjectElectoral democracy-
dc.subjectHuman nature-
dc.subjectPolitical culture-
dc.subjectPolitical meritocracy-
dc.titleWhich Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11712-025-09986-7-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105002477550-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage199-
dc.identifier.epage226-
dc.identifier.eissn1569-7274-
dc.identifier.issnl1540-3009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats