File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s11712-025-09986-7
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105002477550
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy
| Title | Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | China Confucianism Electoral democracy Human nature Political culture Political meritocracy |
| Issue Date | 1-Jun-2025 |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Citation | Dao, 2025, v. 24, n. 2, p. 199-226 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Which political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Zhang Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue. They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/359468 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.323 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bell, Daniel A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Qianfan | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-07T00:30:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-07T00:30:34Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Dao, 2025, v. 24, n. 2, p. 199-226 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1540-3009 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/359468 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Which political system is appropriate for China in the foreseeable future? In this dialogue between two scholars with different interpretations of the Confucian tradition, Zhang Qianfan 張千帆 argues that political leaders should be selected by means of electoral democracy, whereas Daniel A. Bell argues that they should be selected according to superior ability and virtue. They justify their arguments by appealing to contrasting views on human nature, political culture, and the role of the state, and draw some practical implications from Confucian-inspired moral and political theories. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Springer | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Dao | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | China | - |
| dc.subject | Confucianism | - |
| dc.subject | Electoral democracy | - |
| dc.subject | Human nature | - |
| dc.subject | Political culture | - |
| dc.subject | Political meritocracy | - |
| dc.title | Which Political System Is Appropriate for China? An Exchange on Electoral Democracy and Political Meritocracy | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11712-025-09986-7 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105002477550 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 24 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 199 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 226 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1569-7274 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1540-3009 | - |
