File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s12916-024-03760-x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85209756386
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on antihypertensive drugs
| Title | Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on antihypertensive drugs |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | ACE inhibitors Antihypertensive drugs Beta-blockers Calcium channel blockers Mendelian randomization Systematic review |
| Issue Date | 1-Dec-2024 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central |
| Citation | BMC Medicine, 2024, v. 22, n. 1 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: We systematically reviewed Mendelian randomization (MR) studies and summarized evidence on the potential effects of different antihypertensive drugs on health. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for MR studies evaluating the effects of antihypertensive drug classes on health outcomes until 22 May 2024. We extracted data on study characteristics and findings, assessed study quality, and compared the evidence with that from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: We identified 2643 studies in the search, of which 37 studies were included. These studies explored a wide range of health outcomes including cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors, psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, immune function and infection, and other outcomes. There is strong evidence supporting the protective effects of genetically proxied antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular diseases. We found strong protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on diabetes whereas beta-blockers showed adverse effects. ACE inhibitors might increase the risk of psoriasis, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease but did not affect COVID-19. There is strong evidence that ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are beneficial for kidney and immune function, and CCBs showed a safe profile for disorders of pregnancy. Most studies have high quality. RCT evidence supports the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and CCBs on stroke, diabetes, and kidney function. However, there is a lack of reliable RCTs to confirm the associations with other diseases. Conclusions: Evidence of the benefits and off-target effects of antihypertensive drugs contribute to clinical decision-making, pharmacovigilance, and the identification of drug repurposing opportunities. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/359214 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Fan, Bohan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Junmeng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Jie V. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-24T00:30:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-24T00:30:06Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-12-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMC Medicine, 2024, v. 22, n. 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/359214 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: We systematically reviewed Mendelian randomization (MR) studies and summarized evidence on the potential effects of different antihypertensive drugs on health. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for MR studies evaluating the effects of antihypertensive drug classes on health outcomes until 22 May 2024. We extracted data on study characteristics and findings, assessed study quality, and compared the evidence with that from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: We identified 2643 studies in the search, of which 37 studies were included. These studies explored a wide range of health outcomes including cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors, psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, immune function and infection, and other outcomes. There is strong evidence supporting the protective effects of genetically proxied antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular diseases. We found strong protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on diabetes whereas beta-blockers showed adverse effects. ACE inhibitors might increase the risk of psoriasis, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease but did not affect COVID-19. There is strong evidence that ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are beneficial for kidney and immune function, and CCBs showed a safe profile for disorders of pregnancy. Most studies have high quality. RCT evidence supports the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and CCBs on stroke, diabetes, and kidney function. However, there is a lack of reliable RCTs to confirm the associations with other diseases. Conclusions: Evidence of the benefits and off-target effects of antihypertensive drugs contribute to clinical decision-making, pharmacovigilance, and the identification of drug repurposing opportunities. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Medicine | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | ACE inhibitors | - |
| dc.subject | Antihypertensive drugs | - |
| dc.subject | Beta-blockers | - |
| dc.subject | Calcium channel blockers | - |
| dc.subject | Mendelian randomization | - |
| dc.subject | Systematic review | - |
| dc.title | Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on antihypertensive drugs | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12916-024-03760-x | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85209756386 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 22 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1741-7015 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1741-7015 | - |
