File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1145/3690407.3690553
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85212584358
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Research on American option pricing based on HLSM method
| Title | Research on American option pricing based on HLSM method |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | American option HLSM LSM Mean difference test Path difference test |
| Issue Date | 24-Oct-2024 |
| Abstract | Valuing American options and determining optimal exercise timing are pivotal challenges in the financial derivatives market. The original Least Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) approach for pricing American options, introduced by Longstaff and Schwartz in 2001, has since been the basis of numerous enhancements by researchers. This study recognizes a limitation in the LSM method, particularly that it accounts for paths with zero returns in forecasting path payoffs, thus diminishing expected returns. To address this, this study proposes a refined Positive Least Squares Monte Carlo (PLSM) technique, which exclusively incorporates positive returns in regressions. Our empirical tests, including mean and path difference analyses, reveal that while PLSM shows improvements in the returns of individual paths, it results in lower overall pricing compared to LSM. Furthermore, PLSM lacks efficiency in adaptive exercise timing recommendations, |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/358618 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Jiayi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Zhiqiang | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-13T07:47:01Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-13T07:47:01Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-10-24 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/358618 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Valuing American options and determining optimal exercise timing are pivotal challenges in the financial derivatives market. The original Least Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) approach for pricing American options, introduced by Longstaff and Schwartz in 2001, has since been the basis of numerous enhancements by researchers. This study recognizes a limitation in the LSM method, particularly that it accounts for paths with zero returns in forecasting path payoffs, thus diminishing expected returns. To address this, this study proposes a refined Positive Least Squares Monte Carlo (PLSM) technique, which exclusively incorporates positive returns in regressions. Our empirical tests, including mean and path difference analyses, reveal that while PLSM shows improvements in the returns of individual paths, it results in lower overall pricing compared to LSM. Furthermore, PLSM lacks efficiency in adaptive exercise timing recommendations, <br>rendering it unsuitable as a standalone American option pricing model. To overcome PLSM's pricing shortfalls, we introduce a novel Hybrid Least Squares Monte Carlo (HLSM) model that amalgamates LSM-derived and PLSM-derived exercise values to forecast conditional continuation values more accurately. <br></p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 2024 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Algorithms (05/07/2024-07/07/2024, Zhengzhou) | - |
| dc.subject | American option | - |
| dc.subject | HLSM | - |
| dc.subject | LSM | - |
| dc.subject | Mean difference test | - |
| dc.subject | Path difference test | - |
| dc.title | Research on American option pricing based on HLSM method | - |
| dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/3690407.3690553 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85212584358 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 880 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 884 | - |
