File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/ageing/afaf095
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105003219094
- PMID: 40253686
- WOS: WOS:001470024000001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Prediction models for severe treatment-related toxicities in older adults with cancer: a systematic review
| Title | Prediction models for severe treatment-related toxicities in older adults with cancer: a systematic review |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | adverse events cancer chemotherapy geriatric assessment geriatric oncology older people prediction models systematic review |
| Issue Date | 1-Apr-2025 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Citation | Age and Ageing, 2025, v. 54, n. 4 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: Ageing increases the risk of treatment-related toxicities (TRT) in patients with cancer. This systematic review provided an overview of existing prediction models for TRT in this population and evaluated their predictive performances. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases for studies developing severe TRT prediction models in older cancer patients published between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2023. The included models were summarised and assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Results: Out of the 6192 studies identified through literature searching, 12 studies involving 90 819 participants met the inclusion criteria. About 15 prediction models (9 (60%) for diverse cancer types; 6 (40%) for specific cancer types) were analysed. The models included between 4 and 11 variables. The most common predictors were physical function (n = 12, 80%), performance status (n = 5, 33.3%) and the MAX2 index (n = 5, 33.3%). About 2 models (13.3%) had external validation, 9 (60.0%) had internal validation and 6 (40.0%) lacked any validation. All studies were assessed to have a high risk of bias according to the PROBAST criteria. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that existing prediction models for TRT exhibited moderate discrimination ability in older patients with cancer, with significant heterogeneity in clinical settings and predictive variables. Standardised procedures for developing and validating prediction models are essential to improve the prediction of severe TRT in this vulnerable population. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/358182 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.696 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, Wing Lok | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lau, Sally Ka Wing | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mak, Astor | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yau, Chun Ming | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fung, Chak Fung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hou, Holly Li Yu | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kwong, Dora | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Victor Ho Fun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Choi, Horace Chuek Wai | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-25T00:30:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-25T00:30:35Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-04-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Age and Ageing, 2025, v. 54, n. 4 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0002-0729 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/358182 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Background: Ageing increases the risk of treatment-related toxicities (TRT) in patients with cancer. This systematic review provided an overview of existing prediction models for TRT in this population and evaluated their predictive performances. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases for studies developing severe TRT prediction models in older cancer patients published between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2023. The included models were summarised and assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Results: Out of the 6192 studies identified through literature searching, 12 studies involving 90 819 participants met the inclusion criteria. About 15 prediction models (9 (60%) for diverse cancer types; 6 (40%) for specific cancer types) were analysed. The models included between 4 and 11 variables. The most common predictors were physical function (n = 12, 80%), performance status (n = 5, 33.3%) and the MAX2 index (n = 5, 33.3%). About 2 models (13.3%) had external validation, 9 (60.0%) had internal validation and 6 (40.0%) lacked any validation. All studies were assessed to have a high risk of bias according to the PROBAST criteria. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that existing prediction models for TRT exhibited moderate discrimination ability in older patients with cancer, with significant heterogeneity in clinical settings and predictive variables. Standardised procedures for developing and validating prediction models are essential to improve the prediction of severe TRT in this vulnerable population.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Age and Ageing | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | adverse events | - |
| dc.subject | cancer | - |
| dc.subject | chemotherapy | - |
| dc.subject | geriatric assessment | - |
| dc.subject | geriatric oncology | - |
| dc.subject | older people | - |
| dc.subject | prediction models | - |
| dc.subject | systematic review | - |
| dc.title | Prediction models for severe treatment-related toxicities in older adults with cancer: a systematic review | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/ageing/afaf095 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 40253686 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105003219094 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 54 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1468-2834 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001470024000001 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0002-0729 | - |
