File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Why (not) abolish fares? Exploring the global geography of fare-free public transport

TitleWhy (not) abolish fares? Exploring the global geography of fare-free public transport
Authors
KeywordsFare-free public transport
Fares
Public transport
Transport geography
Transport policy
Urban transport
Issue Date2020
Citation
Transportation, 2020, v. 47, n. 6, p. 2807-2835 How to Cite?
AbstractAlthough the policy of abolishing fares in public transport—here referred to as “fare-free public transport” (FFPT)—exists in nearly 100 localities worldwide, it has not been thoroughly researched. To start filling this gap, I enhance the conceptual clarity about fare abolition. I start by providing a definition of FFPT, discussing its different forms, and introducing a distinction between “partial” FFPT and—the main focus of the paper—“full” FFPT. Next, I distinguish three perspectives on full FFPT—first, approaches that assess fare abolition primarily against its economic impact; second, analyses that look at its contribution to “sustainable” development; third, more critical arguments highlighting its politically transformative and socially just potential. Against the background of this debate I offer the most comprehensive inventory of full FFPT programmes to date, and begin to chart and examine their global geography. As a result, FFPT emerges as a policy that takes diverse forms and exists in diverse locations. Supported and contested by diverse rationales, it cannot be analysed as transport instrument alone.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358033
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.363
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKębłowski, Wojciech-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T03:00:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-23T03:00:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationTransportation, 2020, v. 47, n. 6, p. 2807-2835-
dc.identifier.issn0049-4488-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358033-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the policy of abolishing fares in public transport—here referred to as “fare-free public transport” (FFPT)—exists in nearly 100 localities worldwide, it has not been thoroughly researched. To start filling this gap, I enhance the conceptual clarity about fare abolition. I start by providing a definition of FFPT, discussing its different forms, and introducing a distinction between “partial” FFPT and—the main focus of the paper—“full” FFPT. Next, I distinguish three perspectives on full FFPT—first, approaches that assess fare abolition primarily against its economic impact; second, analyses that look at its contribution to “sustainable” development; third, more critical arguments highlighting its politically transformative and socially just potential. Against the background of this debate I offer the most comprehensive inventory of full FFPT programmes to date, and begin to chart and examine their global geography. As a result, FFPT emerges as a policy that takes diverse forms and exists in diverse locations. Supported and contested by diverse rationales, it cannot be analysed as transport instrument alone.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTransportation-
dc.subjectFare-free public transport-
dc.subjectFares-
dc.subjectPublic transport-
dc.subjectTransport geography-
dc.subjectTransport policy-
dc.subjectUrban transport-
dc.titleWhy (not) abolish fares? Exploring the global geography of fare-free public transport-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11116-019-09986-6-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85062876064-
dc.identifier.volume47-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage2807-
dc.identifier.epage2835-
dc.identifier.eissn1572-9435-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000583562100005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats