File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evolution of deep learning tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT images: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleEvolution of deep learning tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT images: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsArtificial intelligence
CBCT
Convolutional neural networks
Deep learning
Tooth segmentation
Transformer
Issue Date26-May-2025
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
BMC Oral Health, 2025, v. 25, n. 1 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Deep learning has been utilized to segment teeth from computed tomography (CT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT). However, the performance of deep learning is unknown due to multiple models and diverse evaluation metrics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the evolution and performance of deep learning in tooth segmentation. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, arXiv.org, and ACM for studies investigating deep learning in human tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT. Included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study (QUADAS-2) tool. Data were extracted for meta-analyses by random-effects models. Results: A total of 30 studies were included in the systematic review, and 28 of them were included for meta-analyses. Various deep learning algorithms were categorized according to the backbone network, encompassing single-stage convolutional models, convolutional models with U-Net architecture, Transformer models, convolutional models with attention mechanisms, and combinations of multiple models. Convolutional models with U-Net architecture were the most commonly used deep learning algorithms. The integration of attention mechanism within convolutional models has become a new topic. 29 evaluation metrics were identified, with Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) being the most popular. The pooled results were 0.93 [0.93, 0.93] for DSC, 0.86 [0.85, 0.87] for Intersection over Union (IoU), 0.22 [0.19, 0.24] for Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD), 0.92 [0.90, 0.94] for sensitivity, 0.71 [0.26, 1.17] for 95% Hausdorff distance, and 0.96 [0.93, 0.98] for precision. No significant difference was observed in the segmentation of single-rooted or multi-rooted teeth. No obvious correlation between sample size and segmentation performance was observed. Conclusions: Multiple deep learning algorithms have been successfully applied to tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT and their evolution has been well summarized and categorized according to their backbone structures. In future, studies are needed with standardized protocols and open labelled datasets.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357622
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKot, Wai Ying-
dc.contributor.authorAu Yeung, Sum Yin-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Yin Yan-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Pui Hang-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Wei Fa-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-22T03:13:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-22T03:13:54Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-26-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health, 2025, v. 25, n. 1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357622-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Deep learning has been utilized to segment teeth from computed tomography (CT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT). However, the performance of deep learning is unknown due to multiple models and diverse evaluation metrics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the evolution and performance of deep learning in tooth segmentation. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, arXiv.org, and ACM for studies investigating deep learning in human tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT. Included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study (QUADAS-2) tool. Data were extracted for meta-analyses by random-effects models. Results: A total of 30 studies were included in the systematic review, and 28 of them were included for meta-analyses. Various deep learning algorithms were categorized according to the backbone network, encompassing single-stage convolutional models, convolutional models with U-Net architecture, Transformer models, convolutional models with attention mechanisms, and combinations of multiple models. Convolutional models with U-Net architecture were the most commonly used deep learning algorithms. The integration of attention mechanism within convolutional models has become a new topic. 29 evaluation metrics were identified, with Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) being the most popular. The pooled results were 0.93 [0.93, 0.93] for DSC, 0.86 [0.85, 0.87] for Intersection over Union (IoU), 0.22 [0.19, 0.24] for Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD), 0.92 [0.90, 0.94] for sensitivity, 0.71 [0.26, 1.17] for 95% Hausdorff distance, and 0.96 [0.93, 0.98] for precision. No significant difference was observed in the segmentation of single-rooted or multi-rooted teeth. No obvious correlation between sample size and segmentation performance was observed. Conclusions: Multiple deep learning algorithms have been successfully applied to tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT and their evolution has been well summarized and categorized according to their backbone structures. In future, studies are needed with standardized protocols and open labelled datasets.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Oral Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence-
dc.subjectCBCT-
dc.subjectConvolutional neural networks-
dc.subjectDeep learning-
dc.subjectTooth segmentation-
dc.subjectTransformer-
dc.titleEvolution of deep learning tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT images: a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-025-05984-6-
dc.identifier.pmid40420051-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105006463413-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6831-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001496020500008-
dc.identifier.issnl1472-6831-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats