File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Massive Modularity: An Ontological Hypothesis or an Adaptationist Discovery Heuristic?

TitleMassive Modularity: An Ontological Hypothesis or an Adaptationist Discovery Heuristic?
Authors
Issue Date7-Nov-2023
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2023, v. 36, n. 4, p. 317-334 How to Cite?
Abstract

Cognitive modules are internal mental structures. Some theorists and empirical researchers hypothesise that the human mind is either partially or massively comprised of structures that are modular in nature. Is the massive modularity of mind hypothesis a cogent view about the ontological nature of human mind or is it, rather, an effective/ineffective adaptationist discovery heuristic for generating predictively successful hypotheses about both heretofore unknown psychological traits and unknown properties of already identified psychological traits? Considering the inadequacies of the case in favour of massive modularity as an ontological hypothesis, I suggest approaching and valuing massive modularity as an adaptationist discovery heuristic.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357165
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.7
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.240
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVillena, David-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:53:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:53:44Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-07-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2023, v. 36, n. 4, p. 317-334-
dc.identifier.issn0269-8595-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/357165-
dc.description.abstract<p>Cognitive modules are internal mental structures. Some theorists and empirical researchers hypothesise that the human mind is either partially or massively comprised of structures that are modular in nature. Is the massive modularity of mind hypothesis a cogent view about the ontological nature of human mind or is it, rather, an effective/ineffective adaptationist discovery heuristic for generating predictively successful hypotheses about both heretofore unknown psychological traits and unknown properties of already identified psychological traits? Considering the inadequacies of the case in favour of massive modularity as an ontological hypothesis, I suggest approaching and valuing massive modularity as an adaptationist discovery heuristic.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleMassive Modularity: An Ontological Hypothesis or an Adaptationist Discovery Heuristic?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02698595.2023.2277999-
dc.identifier.volume36-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage317-
dc.identifier.epage334-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-9281-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001105354200001-
dc.identifier.issnl0269-8595-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats