File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3138/ijfab.12.2.09
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85072652203
- WOS: WOS:000484944500009
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Family for life and death: Family presence during resuscitation
| Title | Family for life and death: Family presence during resuscitation |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Autonomy Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Family Family centered care Relational autonomy |
| Issue Date | 1-Jul-2019 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press |
| Citation | International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2019, v. 12, n. 2, p. 149-164 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | The dilemma of whether to allow relatives to see or even touch their loved one while she undergoes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been discussed for roughly four decades. However, Family Presence During Adult Resuscitation (FPDR) is still not widely implemented. In this paper, I espouse relational autonomy to make a case for a clinical approach of family-centered care and FPDR. In recent years, family-centered care (FCC) has gained increasing support. I argue that relational autonomy provides a conceptual framework for both FCC and FPDR. In turn, FCC provides a plausible clinical approach to justify FPDR, while the empirical evidence that supports FPDR provides a useful example to justify FCC. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356927 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.202 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lederman, Zohar | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-23T08:52:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-23T08:52:31Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-07-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2019, v. 12, n. 2, p. 149-164 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1937-4585 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356927 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p> <span>The dilemma of whether to allow relatives to see or even touch their loved one while she undergoes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been discussed for roughly four decades. However, Family Presence During Adult Resuscitation (FPDR) is still not widely implemented. In this paper, I espouse relational autonomy to make a case for a clinical approach of family-centered care and FPDR. In recent years, family-centered care (FCC) has gained increasing support. I argue that relational autonomy provides a conceptual framework for both FCC and FPDR. In turn, FCC provides a plausible clinical approach to justify FPDR, while the empirical evidence that supports FPDR provides a useful example to justify FCC.</span> <br></p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | University of Toronto Press | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Autonomy | - |
| dc.subject | Cardiopulmonary resuscitation | - |
| dc.subject | Family | - |
| dc.subject | Family centered care | - |
| dc.subject | Relational autonomy | - |
| dc.title | Family for life and death: Family presence during resuscitation | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3138/ijfab.12.2.09 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85072652203 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 149 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 164 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1937-4577 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000484944500009 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1937-4577 | - |
