File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Family for life and death: Family presence during resuscitation

TitleFamily for life and death: Family presence during resuscitation
Authors
KeywordsAutonomy
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Family
Family centered care
Relational autonomy
Issue Date1-Jul-2019
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press
Citation
International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2019, v. 12, n. 2, p. 149-164 How to Cite?
Abstract

The dilemma of whether to allow relatives to see or even touch their loved one while she undergoes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been discussed for roughly four decades. However, Family Presence During Adult Resuscitation (FPDR) is still not widely implemented. In this paper, I espouse relational autonomy to make a case for a clinical approach of family-centered care and FPDR. In recent years, family-centered care (FCC) has gained increasing support. I argue that relational autonomy provides a conceptual framework for both FCC and FPDR. In turn, FCC provides a plausible clinical approach to justify FPDR, while the empirical evidence that supports FPDR provides a useful example to justify FCC.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356927
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.202
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Zohar-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:52:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:52:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2019, v. 12, n. 2, p. 149-164-
dc.identifier.issn1937-4585-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356927-
dc.description.abstract<p> <span>The dilemma of whether to allow relatives to see or even touch their loved one while she undergoes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been discussed for roughly four decades. However, Family Presence During Adult Resuscitation (FPDR) is still not widely implemented. In this paper, I espouse relational autonomy to make a case for a clinical approach of family-centered care and FPDR. In recent years, family-centered care (FCC) has gained increasing support. I argue that relational autonomy provides a conceptual framework for both FCC and FPDR. In turn, FCC provides a plausible clinical approach to justify FPDR, while the empirical evidence that supports FPDR provides a useful example to justify FCC.</span> <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversity of Toronto Press-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAutonomy-
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary resuscitation-
dc.subjectFamily-
dc.subjectFamily centered care-
dc.subjectRelational autonomy-
dc.titleFamily for life and death: Family presence during resuscitation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3138/ijfab.12.2.09-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85072652203-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage149-
dc.identifier.epage164-
dc.identifier.eissn1937-4577-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000484944500009-
dc.identifier.issnl1937-4577-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats