File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Loneliness at the age of COVID-19

TitleLoneliness at the age of COVID-19
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19
Issue Date9-Dec-2022
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
Citation
Journal of Medical Ethics, 2022, v. 49, n. 9, p. 649-654 How to Cite?
AbstractLoneliness has been a major concern for philosophers, poets and psychologists for centuries. In the past several decades, it has concerned clinicians and public health practitioners as well. The research on loneliness is urgent for several reasons. First, loneliness has been and still is extremely ubiquitous, potentially affecting people across multiple demographics and geographical areas. Second, it is philosophically intriguing, and its analysis delves into different branches of philosophy including phenomenology, existentialism, philosophy of mind, etc. Third, empirical research has shown that loneliness is a significant health risk factor. Loneliness may thus be defined as a (negative) social determinant of health.Having that said, COVID-19 has demonstrated how little we as members of humanity have been prepared to face the loneliness resulting from the global response to the virus. As people worldwide are literally dying from loneliness, we still do not know what makes one feel lonely while making another feel being in solitude, or how is it that one feels lonely in the heart of London.In this essay, I first review loneliness in general and specifically in the context of COVID-19. I then argue that loneliness should be understood as a social determinant of health. Lastly, I argue that individuals have a right not to be lonely. Such right stems in turn from the right to healthcare or even a right to health.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356919
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.952
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Zohar-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:52:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:52:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Ethics, 2022, v. 49, n. 9, p. 649-654-
dc.identifier.issn0306-6800-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356919-
dc.description.abstractLoneliness has been a major concern for philosophers, poets and psychologists for centuries. In the past several decades, it has concerned clinicians and public health practitioners as well. The research on loneliness is urgent for several reasons. First, loneliness has been and still is extremely ubiquitous, potentially affecting people across multiple demographics and geographical areas. Second, it is philosophically intriguing, and its analysis delves into different branches of philosophy including phenomenology, existentialism, philosophy of mind, etc. Third, empirical research has shown that loneliness is a significant health risk factor. Loneliness may thus be defined as a (negative) social determinant of health.Having that said, COVID-19 has demonstrated how little we as members of humanity have been prepared to face the loneliness resulting from the global response to the virus. As people worldwide are literally dying from loneliness, we still do not know what makes one feel lonely while making another feel being in solitude, or how is it that one feels lonely in the heart of London.In this essay, I first review loneliness in general and specifically in the context of COVID-19. I then argue that loneliness should be understood as a social determinant of health. Lastly, I argue that individuals have a right not to be lonely. Such right stems in turn from the right to healthcare or even a right to health.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Ethics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.titleLoneliness at the age of COVID-19-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jme-2022-108540-
dc.identifier.pmid36600628-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85144885752-
dc.identifier.volume49-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage649-
dc.identifier.epage654-
dc.identifier.eissn1473-4257-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000897893500001-
dc.publisher.placeLONDON-
dc.identifier.issnl0306-6800-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats