File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Eating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement

TitleEating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement
Authors
Keywordsbodily sovereignty
force feeding
human rights
moral autonomy
moral theory
solitary confinement
Issue Date23-Jan-2023
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2023, v. 32, n. 3, p. 414-424 How to Cite?
AbstractThe practice of solitary confinement (SC) is established within the literature as a common occurrence of torture within the prison system, and many international and national human rights organizations have called for its abolition. A somewhat more contentious topic in the literature is the practice of force feeding (FF) of hunger-striking prisoners. The paper aims to make a case against FF by establishing a parity argument that states the following: If SC is considered an immoral practice (and indeed it should be), it should follow that FF is morally impermissible as well. In conclusion, this paper will argue that FF of hunger-striking prisoners is a violation of their fundamental moral rights and constitutes cruel and inhumane treatment and, therefore, should be abolished.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356918
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.462
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuzath, Emma-
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Zohar-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:52:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:52:28Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-23-
dc.identifier.citationCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2023, v. 32, n. 3, p. 414-424-
dc.identifier.issn0963-1801-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356918-
dc.description.abstractThe practice of solitary confinement (SC) is established within the literature as a common occurrence of torture within the prison system, and many international and national human rights organizations have called for its abolition. A somewhat more contentious topic in the literature is the practice of force feeding (FF) of hunger-striking prisoners. The paper aims to make a case against FF by establishing a parity argument that states the following: If SC is considered an immoral practice (and indeed it should be), it should follow that FF is morally impermissible as well. In conclusion, this paper will argue that FF of hunger-striking prisoners is a violation of their fundamental moral rights and constitutes cruel and inhumane treatment and, therefore, should be abolished.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbodily sovereignty-
dc.subjectforce feeding-
dc.subjecthuman rights-
dc.subjectmoral autonomy-
dc.subjectmoral theory-
dc.subjectsolitary confinement-
dc.titleEating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0963180122000883-
dc.identifier.pmid36688294-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85163229736-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage414-
dc.identifier.epage424-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-2147-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000921620900001-
dc.publisher.placeNEW YORK-
dc.identifier.issnl0963-1801-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats