File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Attitudes of Singapore Emergency Department staff towards family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

TitleAttitudes of Singapore Emergency Department staff towards family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Authors
Keywordsautonomy
cardiopulmonary resuscitation
end of life care
Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Issue Date1-Jul-2017
PublisherSAGE Publications
Citation
Clinical Ethics, 2017, v. 12, n. 3, p. 124-134 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: Family presence during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation is still not widely implemented. Based on empirical evidence, various national and international professional organizations recommend allowing relatives to be present during resuscitation. However, healthcare providers worldwide are still reluctant to make it standard care. Purpose: This paper is a part of an ongoing cross-cultural study that aims to solicit attitudes of healthcare providers working in emergency departments towards family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This paper reports the qualitative data from surveying healthcare providers working in an emergency department at a university-affiliated hospital in Singapore. Method: Healthcare workers were asked to fill out an online survey, including both quantitative and qualitative questions. Their attitudes were critically analyzed and compared with existing empirical data. Results: Majority of healthcare workers (71.6%) believed that relatives should not be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 52% thought that relatives would not want to be present. Conclusion: Most emergency department doctors and nurses in Singapore do not support family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Their concerns included: family’s possible interruption of patient care, the relatives’ well-being, and their own interests, as well as limited physical space and resources. Most of these concerns do not stand in the face of existing empirical data or ethical scrutiny. We therefore recommend in favor of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356904
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.240

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Zohar-
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Geraldine-
dc.contributor.authorDong, Chaoyan-
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Benjamin SH-
dc.contributor.authorPal, Rakhee Y-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T08:52:16Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T08:52:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Ethics, 2017, v. 12, n. 3, p. 124-134-
dc.identifier.issn1477-7509-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356904-
dc.description.abstract<p> <span>Background: Family presence during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation is still not widely implemented. Based on empirical evidence, various national and international professional organizations recommend allowing relatives to be present during resuscitation. However, healthcare providers worldwide are still reluctant to make it standard care. Purpose: This paper is a part of an ongoing cross-cultural study that aims to solicit attitudes of healthcare providers working in emergency departments towards family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This paper reports the qualitative data from surveying healthcare providers working in an emergency department at a university-affiliated hospital in Singapore. Method: Healthcare workers were asked to fill out an online survey, including both quantitative and qualitative questions. Their attitudes were critically analyzed and compared with existing empirical data. Results: Majority of healthcare workers (71.6%) believed that relatives should not be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 52% thought that relatives would not want to be present. Conclusion: Most emergency department doctors and nurses in Singapore do not support family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Their concerns included: family’s possible interruption of patient care, the relatives’ well-being, and their own interests, as well as limited physical space and resources. Most of these concerns do not stand in the face of existing empirical data or ethical scrutiny. We therefore recommend in favor of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. </span> <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Ethics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectautonomy-
dc.subjectcardiopulmonary resuscitation-
dc.subjectend of life care-
dc.subjectFamily presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation-
dc.titleAttitudes of Singapore Emergency Department staff towards family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1477750917706175-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85029517299-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage124-
dc.identifier.epage134-
dc.identifier.eissn1758-101X-
dc.identifier.issnl1477-7509-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats