File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115292
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85217474910
- WOS: WOS:001427219300001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Disease-free survival as surrogate for overall survival in esophageal cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy
| Title | Disease-free survival as surrogate for overall survival in esophageal cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cabrit, NicolasCheugoua-Zanetsie, MauriceTierney, JayneThirion, PierreNankivell, MatthewWinter, KathrynYang, HongWijnhoven, BasVernerey, DewiSmithers, B. MarkPiessen, GuillaumeNilsson, MagnusBoonstra, JurjenYchou, MarcLaw, SimonCunningham, DavidVathaire, Florent deStahl, MichaelUrba, SusanValmasoni, MicheleWilliaume, DanièleThomas, JanineLordick, FlorianTepper, JoelGebski, ValBurmeister, BryanPaoletti, XavierSandick, Johanna vanFu, JianhuaPignon, Jean PierreDucreux, MichelFaron, MatthieuMichiels, Stefan |
| Keywords | Chemotherapy Esophageal cancer Gastroesophageal junction Individual patient data network meta-analysis Preoperative Radiotherapy Surrogate endpoint |
| Issue Date | 7-Feb-2025 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | European Journal of Cancer, 2025, v. 218 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: The use of surrogate endpoints may expedite the reporting of study outcomes of clinical trials. The validity of disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal (E) or gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) carcinomas remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate DFS as a surrogate end-point for OS in E/GEJ using the meta-analytical approach Design, setting, and participants: individual patient data from an international meta-analysis on operable locally advanced E/GEJ, which including randomized trials comparing at least two of the neo-adjuvant treatment strategies: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and/or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). Main outcomes and measures: Individual (Kendall's tau) and trial-level (R2) correlations between DFS and OS were estimated using a Clayton copula. Results: DFS and OS data were available for a total of 4518 pts: 2222 pts included in CS vs S, 1908 pts in CRS vs S, and 388 in CS vs CRS comparisons. 3440 patients had a DFS event and 3303 patients died. Kendall's tau was 0.73 [95 % CI 0.71 – 0.75] and R2 trial-level correlation was 0.95 [0.84 – 0.99] for CS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.76 [0.74 – 0.77] and R2 was 0.96 [0.87 – 0.99] for CRS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.87 [0.78 – 0.92] and R2 was 0.93 [0.43 – 1] for CRS vs CS. In a multistate model, the median time in the recurrence state was shorter in older vs more recent trials: mean time of 10.8 [10.2 – 11.4] vs 16.5 months [15.4–17.6]. Conclusions and relevance: DFS is a validated surrogate endpoint for OS in trials evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in E/GEJ. DFS may be more useful as an endpoint when delays between recurrences and death become larger. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356879 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.501 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cabrit, Nicolas | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheugoua-Zanetsie, Maurice | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tierney, Jayne | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Thirion, Pierre | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nankivell, Matthew | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Winter, Kathryn | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang, Hong | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wijnhoven, Bas | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Vernerey, Dewi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Smithers, B. Mark | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Piessen, Guillaume | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nilsson, Magnus | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Boonstra, Jurjen | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ychou, Marc | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Law, Simon | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cunningham, David | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Vathaire, Florent de | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Stahl, Michael | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Urba, Susan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Valmasoni, Michele | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Williaume, Danièle | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Thomas, Janine | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lordick, Florian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tepper, Joel | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gebski, Val | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Burmeister, Bryan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Paoletti, Xavier | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sandick, Johanna van | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fu, Jianhua | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pignon, Jean Pierre | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ducreux, Michel | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Faron, Matthieu | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Michiels, Stefan | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-22T00:35:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-22T00:35:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | European Journal of Cancer, 2025, v. 218 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0959-8049 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356879 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The use of surrogate endpoints may expedite the reporting of study outcomes of clinical trials. The validity of disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal (E) or gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) carcinomas remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate DFS as a surrogate end-point for OS in E/GEJ using the meta-analytical approach Design, setting, and participants: individual patient data from an international meta-analysis on operable locally advanced E/GEJ, which including randomized trials comparing at least two of the neo-adjuvant treatment strategies: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and/or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). Main outcomes and measures: Individual (Kendall's tau) and trial-level (R2) correlations between DFS and OS were estimated using a Clayton copula. Results: DFS and OS data were available for a total of 4518 pts: 2222 pts included in CS vs S, 1908 pts in CRS vs S, and 388 in CS vs CRS comparisons. 3440 patients had a DFS event and 3303 patients died. Kendall's tau was 0.73 [95 % CI 0.71 – 0.75] and R2 trial-level correlation was 0.95 [0.84 – 0.99] for CS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.76 [0.74 – 0.77] and R2 was 0.96 [0.87 – 0.99] for CRS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.87 [0.78 – 0.92] and R2 was 0.93 [0.43 – 1] for CRS vs CS. In a multistate model, the median time in the recurrence state was shorter in older vs more recent trials: mean time of 10.8 [10.2 – 11.4] vs 16.5 months [15.4–17.6]. Conclusions and relevance: DFS is a validated surrogate endpoint for OS in trials evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in E/GEJ. DFS may be more useful as an endpoint when delays between recurrences and death become larger. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Cancer | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Chemotherapy | - |
| dc.subject | Esophageal cancer | - |
| dc.subject | Gastroesophageal junction | - |
| dc.subject | Individual patient data network meta-analysis | - |
| dc.subject | Preoperative | - |
| dc.subject | Radiotherapy | - |
| dc.subject | Surrogate endpoint | - |
| dc.title | Disease-free survival as surrogate for overall survival in esophageal cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115292 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85217474910 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 218 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001427219300001 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0959-8049 | - |
