File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Atlas of Gray Matter Volume Differences Across Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review With a Novel Meta-Analysis That Considers Co-Occurring Disorders

TitleAtlas of Gray Matter Volume Differences Across Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review With a Novel Meta-Analysis That Considers Co-Occurring Disorders
Authors
KeywordsAnxiety disorders
Comorbidity
Gray matter volume
Major depressive disorder
Meta-analysis
Psychiatric conditions
Issue Date11-Jun-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Biological Psychiatry, 2025, v. 98, n. 1, p. 76-90 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Regional gray matter volume (GMV) differences between individuals with mental disorders and comparison participants may be confounded by co-occurring disorders. To disentangle disorder-specific GMV correlates, we conducted a large-scale multidisorder meta-analysis using a novel approach that explicitly models co-occurring disorders. Methods: We systematically reviewed voxel-based morphometry studies indexed in PubMed and Scopus up to January 2023 that compared adults with major mental disorders (anorexia nervosa, schizophrenia spectrum, anxiety, bipolar, major depressive, obsessive-compulsive, and posttraumatic stress disorders plus attention-deficit/hyperactivity, autism spectrum, and borderline personality disorders) with comparison participants. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We derived GMV correlates for each disorder using: 1) a multidisorder meta-analysis that accounted for all co-occurring mental disorders simultaneously and 2) separate standard meta-analyses for each disorder in which co-occurring disorders were ignored. We assessed the alterations’ extent, intensity (effect size), and specificity (interdisorder correlations and transdiagnostic alterations) for both approaches. Results: We included 433 studies (499 datasets) involving 19,718 patients and 16,441 comparison participants (51% female, ages 20–67 years). We provide GMV correlate maps for each disorder using both approaches. The novel approach, which accounted for co-occurring disorders, produced GMV correlates that were more focal and disorder specific (less correlated across disorders and fewer transdiagnostic abnormalities). Conclusions: This work offers the most comprehensive atlas of GMV correlates across major mental disorders. Modeling co-occurring disorders yielded more specific correlates, supporting this approach's validity. The atlas NIfTI maps are available online.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356809
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.786

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFortea, Lydia-
dc.contributor.authorOrtuño, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorDe Prisco, Michele-
dc.contributor.authorOliva, Vincenzo-
dc.contributor.authorAlbajes-Eizagirre, Anton-
dc.contributor.authorFortea, Adriana-
dc.contributor.authorMadero, Santiago-
dc.contributor.authorSolanes, Aleix-
dc.contributor.authorVilajosana, Enric-
dc.contributor.authorYao, Yuanwei-
dc.contributor.authorDel Fabro, Lorenzo-
dc.contributor.authorSolé, Eduard-
dc.contributor.authorVerdolini, Norma-
dc.contributor.authorFarré-Colomés, Alvar-
dc.contributor.authorSerra-Blasco, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorPicó-Pérez, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorLukito, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorWise, Toby-
dc.contributor.authorCarlisi, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorArnone, Danilo-
dc.contributor.authorKempton, Matthew J.-
dc.contributor.authorHauson, Alexander Omar-
dc.contributor.authorWollman, Scott-
dc.contributor.authorSoriano-Mas, Carles-
dc.contributor.authorRubia, Katya-
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorFusar-Poli, Paolo-
dc.contributor.authorMataix-Cols, David-
dc.contributor.authorValentí, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorVia, Esther-
dc.contributor.authorCardoner, Narcis-
dc.contributor.authorSolmi, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jintao-
dc.contributor.authorPan, Pinglei-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Jae Il-
dc.contributor.authorFullana, Miquel A.-
dc.contributor.authorVieta, Eduard-
dc.contributor.authorRadua, Joaquim-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-19T00:35:11Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-19T00:35:11Z-
dc.date.issued2025-06-11-
dc.identifier.citationBiological Psychiatry, 2025, v. 98, n. 1, p. 76-90-
dc.identifier.issn0006-3223-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356809-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Regional gray matter volume (GMV) differences between individuals with mental disorders and comparison participants may be confounded by co-occurring disorders. To disentangle disorder-specific GMV correlates, we conducted a large-scale multidisorder meta-analysis using a novel approach that explicitly models co-occurring disorders. Methods: We systematically reviewed voxel-based morphometry studies indexed in PubMed and Scopus up to January 2023 that compared adults with major mental disorders (anorexia nervosa, schizophrenia spectrum, anxiety, bipolar, major depressive, obsessive-compulsive, and posttraumatic stress disorders plus attention-deficit/hyperactivity, autism spectrum, and borderline personality disorders) with comparison participants. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We derived GMV correlates for each disorder using: 1) a multidisorder meta-analysis that accounted for all co-occurring mental disorders simultaneously and 2) separate standard meta-analyses for each disorder in which co-occurring disorders were ignored. We assessed the alterations’ extent, intensity (effect size), and specificity (interdisorder correlations and transdiagnostic alterations) for both approaches. Results: We included 433 studies (499 datasets) involving 19,718 patients and 16,441 comparison participants (51% female, ages 20–67 years). We provide GMV correlate maps for each disorder using both approaches. The novel approach, which accounted for co-occurring disorders, produced GMV correlates that were more focal and disorder specific (less correlated across disorders and fewer transdiagnostic abnormalities). Conclusions: This work offers the most comprehensive atlas of GMV correlates across major mental disorders. Modeling co-occurring disorders yielded more specific correlates, supporting this approach's validity. The atlas NIfTI maps are available online.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Psychiatry-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAnxiety disorders-
dc.subjectComorbidity-
dc.subjectGray matter volume-
dc.subjectMajor depressive disorder-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectPsychiatric conditions-
dc.titleAtlas of Gray Matter Volume Differences Across Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review With a Novel Meta-Analysis That Considers Co-Occurring Disorders-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.020-
dc.identifier.pmid39491638-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85213986601-
dc.identifier.volume98-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage76-
dc.identifier.epage90-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2402-
dc.identifier.issnl0006-3223-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats