File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Integrating brain imaging features and genomic profiles for the subtyping of major depression

TitleIntegrating brain imaging features and genomic profiles for the subtyping of major depression
Authors
Keywordsbrain structural features
brain tissues
genotype-predicted gene expression
MDD subtyping
multi-view biclustering
Issue Date22-May-2025
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Psychological Medicine, 2025, v. 55 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground Precise stratification of patients into homogeneous disease subgroups could address the heterogeneity of phenotypes and enhance understanding of the pathophysiology underlying specific subtypes. Existing literature on subtyping patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) mainly utilized clinical features only. Genomic and imaging data may improve subtyping, but advanced methods are required due to the high dimensionality of features. Methods We propose a novel disease subtyping framework for MDD by integrating brain structural features, genotype-predicted expression levels in brain tissues, and clinical features. Using a multi-view biclustering approach, we classify patients into clinically and biologically homogeneous subgroups. Additionally, we propose approaches to identify causally relevant genes for clustering. Results We verified the reliability of the subtyping model by internal and external validation. High prediction strengths (PS) (average PS: 0.896, minimum: 0.854), a measure of generalizability of the derived clusters in independent datasets, support the validity of our approach. External validation using patient outcome variables (treatment response and hospitalization risks) confirmed the clinical relevance of the identified subgroups. Furthermore, subtype-defining genes overlapped with known susceptibility genes for MDD and were involved in relevant biological pathways. In addition, drug repositioning analysis based on these genes prioritized promising candidates for subtype-specific treatments. Conclusions Our approach successfully stratified MDD patients into subgroups with distinct clinical prognoses. The identification of biologically and clinically meaningful subtypes may enable more personalized treatment strategies. This study also provides a framework for disease subtyping that can be extended to other complex disorders.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356799
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.768
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYin, L.-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorQiu, J.-
dc.contributor.authorXiang, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, M.-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, X.-
dc.contributor.authorLui, S.S.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorSo, H.C.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-17T00:35:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-17T00:35:28Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-22-
dc.identifier.citationPsychological Medicine, 2025, v. 55-
dc.identifier.issn0033-2917-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356799-
dc.description.abstractBackground Precise stratification of patients into homogeneous disease subgroups could address the heterogeneity of phenotypes and enhance understanding of the pathophysiology underlying specific subtypes. Existing literature on subtyping patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) mainly utilized clinical features only. Genomic and imaging data may improve subtyping, but advanced methods are required due to the high dimensionality of features. Methods We propose a novel disease subtyping framework for MDD by integrating brain structural features, genotype-predicted expression levels in brain tissues, and clinical features. Using a multi-view biclustering approach, we classify patients into clinically and biologically homogeneous subgroups. Additionally, we propose approaches to identify causally relevant genes for clustering. Results We verified the reliability of the subtyping model by internal and external validation. High prediction strengths (PS) (average PS: 0.896, minimum: 0.854), a measure of generalizability of the derived clusters in independent datasets, support the validity of our approach. External validation using patient outcome variables (treatment response and hospitalization risks) confirmed the clinical relevance of the identified subgroups. Furthermore, subtype-defining genes overlapped with known susceptibility genes for MDD and were involved in relevant biological pathways. In addition, drug repositioning analysis based on these genes prioritized promising candidates for subtype-specific treatments. Conclusions Our approach successfully stratified MDD patients into subgroups with distinct clinical prognoses. The identification of biologically and clinically meaningful subtypes may enable more personalized treatment strategies. This study also provides a framework for disease subtyping that can be extended to other complex disorders.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofPsychological Medicine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbrain structural features-
dc.subjectbrain tissues-
dc.subjectgenotype-predicted gene expression-
dc.subjectMDD subtyping-
dc.subjectmulti-view biclustering-
dc.titleIntegrating brain imaging features and genomic profiles for the subtyping of major depression-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0033291725001096-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105006444929-
dc.identifier.volume55-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-8978-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001492498000001-
dc.identifier.issnl0033-2917-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats