File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/jocn.17116
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85193568131
- PMID: 38764213
- WOS: WOS:001226804000001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Tracheostomy care of non-ventilated patients and COVID considerations: A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements
| Title | Tracheostomy care of non-ventilated patients and COVID considerations: A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | airway care clinical consensus statement clinical practice guideline COVID-19 non-mechanical ventilation quality appraisal tracheostomy |
| Issue Date | 19-May-2024 |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Citation | Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2024, v. 33, n. 8, p. 3033-3055 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: The purpose of this study is to examine and evaluate the existing clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements regarding tracheostomy care for non-mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: A systematic search of databases, and professional organisations was conducted from inception to 19 March 2023. Two appraisers evaluated each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Text and Opinion Papers. Results: No specific clinical guidelines exist on airway management in non-mechanically ventilated patients. Of 6318 articles identified, we included 12 clinical practice guidelines, and 9 consensus statements, which were from China, the US, the UK, South Korea, Australia, France and Belgium. The AGREE II scores in six domains are (1) the scope and purpose, 70.30%; (2) stakeholder involvement, 37.61%; (3) rigor of development, 33.97%; (4) clarity of presentation, 68.16%; (5) applicability, 44.23% and (6) editorial independence, 40.06%. The overall quality of evidence was level B. The summarised recommendations for clinical practice encompass the following six areas: airway humidification, management of the trach cuff, management of inner cannula, tracheostoma care, tracheostomy suctioning and management and prevention of common post-operative complications. Conclusions: The overall quality of the clinical guidelines on non-ventilated tracheostomy care was moderate, and further improvements are needed in domains of stakeholder involvement, applicability, clarity of presentation and editorial independence. Recommendations on non-ventilated tracheostomy care are often embedded in the guidelines on ventilated tracheostomy. Specific clinical guidelines are needed to provide a standardised approach to tracheostomy care for non-ventilated patients. Relevance to clinical practice: Patients with non-ventilated tracheostomy need specialised airway management. Improving patient outcomes requires standardised protocols, patient involvement, quality evaluation, and interdisciplinary approaches. No patient or public contribution: The study reviewed clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements, therefore patient or public input was not needed. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356779 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.235 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Mu, Juan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Tongyao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ji, Mengmeng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yin, Qian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Zhiwen | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-17T00:35:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-17T00:35:16Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-05-19 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2024, v. 33, n. 8, p. 3033-3055 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0962-1067 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356779 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The purpose of this study is to examine and evaluate the existing clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements regarding tracheostomy care for non-mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: A systematic search of databases, and professional organisations was conducted from inception to 19 March 2023. Two appraisers evaluated each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Text and Opinion Papers. Results: No specific clinical guidelines exist on airway management in non-mechanically ventilated patients. Of 6318 articles identified, we included 12 clinical practice guidelines, and 9 consensus statements, which were from China, the US, the UK, South Korea, Australia, France and Belgium. The AGREE II scores in six domains are (1) the scope and purpose, 70.30%; (2) stakeholder involvement, 37.61%; (3) rigor of development, 33.97%; (4) clarity of presentation, 68.16%; (5) applicability, 44.23% and (6) editorial independence, 40.06%. The overall quality of evidence was level B. The summarised recommendations for clinical practice encompass the following six areas: airway humidification, management of the trach cuff, management of inner cannula, tracheostoma care, tracheostomy suctioning and management and prevention of common post-operative complications. Conclusions: The overall quality of the clinical guidelines on non-ventilated tracheostomy care was moderate, and further improvements are needed in domains of stakeholder involvement, applicability, clarity of presentation and editorial independence. Recommendations on non-ventilated tracheostomy care are often embedded in the guidelines on ventilated tracheostomy. Specific clinical guidelines are needed to provide a standardised approach to tracheostomy care for non-ventilated patients. Relevance to clinical practice: Patients with non-ventilated tracheostomy need specialised airway management. Improving patient outcomes requires standardised protocols, patient involvement, quality evaluation, and interdisciplinary approaches. No patient or public contribution: The study reviewed clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements, therefore patient or public input was not needed. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Nursing | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | airway care | - |
| dc.subject | clinical consensus statement | - |
| dc.subject | clinical practice guideline | - |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | - |
| dc.subject | non-mechanical ventilation | - |
| dc.subject | quality appraisal | - |
| dc.subject | tracheostomy | - |
| dc.title | Tracheostomy care of non-ventilated patients and COVID considerations: A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jocn.17116 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 38764213 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85193568131 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 33 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 8 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 3033 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 3055 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1365-2702 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001226804000001 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0962-1067 | - |
