File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Tracheostomy care of non-ventilated patients and COVID considerations: A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements

TitleTracheostomy care of non-ventilated patients and COVID considerations: A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements
Authors
Keywordsairway care
clinical consensus statement
clinical practice guideline
COVID-19
non-mechanical ventilation
quality appraisal
tracheostomy
Issue Date19-May-2024
PublisherWiley
Citation
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2024, v. 33, n. 8, p. 3033-3055 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The purpose of this study is to examine and evaluate the existing clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements regarding tracheostomy care for non-mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: A systematic search of databases, and professional organisations was conducted from inception to 19 March 2023. Two appraisers evaluated each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Text and Opinion Papers. Results: No specific clinical guidelines exist on airway management in non-mechanically ventilated patients. Of 6318 articles identified, we included 12 clinical practice guidelines, and 9 consensus statements, which were from China, the US, the UK, South Korea, Australia, France and Belgium. The AGREE II scores in six domains are (1) the scope and purpose, 70.30%; (2) stakeholder involvement, 37.61%; (3) rigor of development, 33.97%; (4) clarity of presentation, 68.16%; (5) applicability, 44.23% and (6) editorial independence, 40.06%. The overall quality of evidence was level B. The summarised recommendations for clinical practice encompass the following six areas: airway humidification, management of the trach cuff, management of inner cannula, tracheostoma care, tracheostomy suctioning and management and prevention of common post-operative complications. Conclusions: The overall quality of the clinical guidelines on non-ventilated tracheostomy care was moderate, and further improvements are needed in domains of stakeholder involvement, applicability, clarity of presentation and editorial independence. Recommendations on non-ventilated tracheostomy care are often embedded in the guidelines on ventilated tracheostomy. Specific clinical guidelines are needed to provide a standardised approach to tracheostomy care for non-ventilated patients. Relevance to clinical practice: Patients with non-ventilated tracheostomy need specialised airway management. Improving patient outcomes requires standardised protocols, patient involvement, quality evaluation, and interdisciplinary approaches. No patient or public contribution: The study reviewed clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements, therefore patient or public input was not needed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356779
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.235
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMu, Juan-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Tongyao-
dc.contributor.authorJi, Mengmeng-
dc.contributor.authorYin, Qian-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Zhiwen-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-17T00:35:16Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-17T00:35:16Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-19-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2024, v. 33, n. 8, p. 3033-3055-
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356779-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this study is to examine and evaluate the existing clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements regarding tracheostomy care for non-mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: A systematic search of databases, and professional organisations was conducted from inception to 19 March 2023. Two appraisers evaluated each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Text and Opinion Papers. Results: No specific clinical guidelines exist on airway management in non-mechanically ventilated patients. Of 6318 articles identified, we included 12 clinical practice guidelines, and 9 consensus statements, which were from China, the US, the UK, South Korea, Australia, France and Belgium. The AGREE II scores in six domains are (1) the scope and purpose, 70.30%; (2) stakeholder involvement, 37.61%; (3) rigor of development, 33.97%; (4) clarity of presentation, 68.16%; (5) applicability, 44.23% and (6) editorial independence, 40.06%. The overall quality of evidence was level B. The summarised recommendations for clinical practice encompass the following six areas: airway humidification, management of the trach cuff, management of inner cannula, tracheostoma care, tracheostomy suctioning and management and prevention of common post-operative complications. Conclusions: The overall quality of the clinical guidelines on non-ventilated tracheostomy care was moderate, and further improvements are needed in domains of stakeholder involvement, applicability, clarity of presentation and editorial independence. Recommendations on non-ventilated tracheostomy care are often embedded in the guidelines on ventilated tracheostomy. Specific clinical guidelines are needed to provide a standardised approach to tracheostomy care for non-ventilated patients. Relevance to clinical practice: Patients with non-ventilated tracheostomy need specialised airway management. Improving patient outcomes requires standardised protocols, patient involvement, quality evaluation, and interdisciplinary approaches. No patient or public contribution: The study reviewed clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements, therefore patient or public input was not needed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Nursing-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectairway care-
dc.subjectclinical consensus statement-
dc.subjectclinical practice guideline-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectnon-mechanical ventilation-
dc.subjectquality appraisal-
dc.subjecttracheostomy-
dc.titleTracheostomy care of non-ventilated patients and COVID considerations: A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.17116-
dc.identifier.pmid38764213-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85193568131-
dc.identifier.volume33-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage3033-
dc.identifier.epage3055-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2702-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001226804000001-
dc.identifier.issnl0962-1067-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats