File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Utility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review

TitleUtility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review
Authors
Keywordseconomic evaluation
EQ-5D
gastric cancer
health-state utility values
Issue Date2025
Citation
Value in Health Regional Issues, 2025, v. 46, article no. 101063 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Gastric cancer (GC) imposes a significant burden of disease globally. Multiple treatments are available but are associated with high costs and potentially detrimental effects on quality of life. The utility values of health status are measures of patient preference over quality of life, which are increasingly used for health and economic decision-making. Currently, there is little systematized information on the utility values for different stages of GC. This systematic review synthesizes and meta-analyses the literature on GC utilities. Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting utility values calculated using direct and indirect methods. Information from the selected studies was extracted and appraised, and meta-analyses of utility values based on GC health states were performed. Results: Twelve studies involving 4585 patients were included. Random-effects meta-analysis estimates showed a mean utility of 0.77 (95% CI 0.7–0.85) for stage I, 0.75 (95% CI 0.65–0.85) for stage II, 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.96) for stage III, and 0.64 (95% CI 0.56–0.32) for stage IV. All estimates showed considerable heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our study provides an updated overview of the literature on utility values in GC and presents a discussion of the relevance of GC stages for its analysis. Decision-makers should consider patients’ preferences in the proposal of policies and clinical decisions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356347
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.525
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Cristian-
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorLibuy, Matías-
dc.contributor.authorCrispi, Francisca-
dc.contributor.authorRiquelme, Arnoldo-
dc.contributor.authorAlarid-Escudero, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorLatorre, Gonzalo-
dc.contributor.authorPizarro, Margarita-
dc.contributor.authorCuadrado, Cristóbal-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T07:22:19Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-27T07:22:19Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationValue in Health Regional Issues, 2025, v. 46, article no. 101063-
dc.identifier.issn2212-1099-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356347-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Gastric cancer (GC) imposes a significant burden of disease globally. Multiple treatments are available but are associated with high costs and potentially detrimental effects on quality of life. The utility values of health status are measures of patient preference over quality of life, which are increasingly used for health and economic decision-making. Currently, there is little systematized information on the utility values for different stages of GC. This systematic review synthesizes and meta-analyses the literature on GC utilities. Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting utility values calculated using direct and indirect methods. Information from the selected studies was extracted and appraised, and meta-analyses of utility values based on GC health states were performed. Results: Twelve studies involving 4585 patients were included. Random-effects meta-analysis estimates showed a mean utility of 0.77 (95% CI 0.7–0.85) for stage I, 0.75 (95% CI 0.65–0.85) for stage II, 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.96) for stage III, and 0.64 (95% CI 0.56–0.32) for stage IV. All estimates showed considerable heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our study provides an updated overview of the literature on utility values in GC and presents a discussion of the relevance of GC stages for its analysis. Decision-makers should consider patients’ preferences in the proposal of policies and clinical decisions.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofValue in Health Regional Issues-
dc.subjecteconomic evaluation-
dc.subjectEQ-5D-
dc.subjectgastric cancer-
dc.subjecthealth-state utility values-
dc.titleUtility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101063-
dc.identifier.pmid39892180-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85216511790-
dc.identifier.volume46-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 101063-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 101063-
dc.identifier.eissn2212-1102-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001417292700001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats