File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/S0266462324000527
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85210916861
- PMID: 39618408
- WOS: WOS:001368611800001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: How can managed entry agreements contribute to coverage decisions in Latin America?
| Title | How can managed entry agreements contribute to coverage decisions in Latin America? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | financial Latin America managed entry agreements risk sharing technology assessment |
| Issue Date | 2024 |
| Citation | International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2024, v. 40, n. 1, article no. e65 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Context: Healthcare stakeholders in Latin America, including payers, manufacturers, and patients, seek to expedite access to technologies. However, uncertainty sometimes surrounds their true benefits and budgetary implications. Managed entry agreements (MEAs) are proposed to address this uncertainty by redistributing risks among key actors. Objectives: The objective of Health Technology Assessment International’s 2023 Latin American Policy Forum was to examine the potential utility of MEA in technology reimbursement and decision-making processes in the region. Methods: This article is based on a background document, a survey, and the deliberative work of the country representatives and others who participated in the Policy Forum. Results: Interest in MEA in Latin America is increasing, with financial agreements being more prevalent than those based on clinical outcomes. During the Policy Forum, potential barriers to MEA implementation were identified, such as the lack of legal frameworks, insufficient reliable data, and, in some cases, distrust among stakeholders. Some potential solutions were also identified, including early stakeholder involvement to enhance dialogue and understanding, and piloting shorter-duration MEA to facilitate the revision of agreement terms, especially in situations of epidemiological uncertainty. Conclusions: The Policy Forum served as a valuable platform for discussing the importance of flexible MEA implementation that acknowledges data uncertainty, promotes transparent dialogue to incorporate opinions and values from all stakeholders, and develops legal frameworks to support effective technology access schemes in Latin America. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356341 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.846 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Martí, Sebastián García | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pichon-Riviere, Andrés | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Augustovski, Federico | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Espinoza, Manuel | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-27T07:22:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-27T07:22:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2024, v. 40, n. 1, article no. e65 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0266-4623 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356341 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Context: Healthcare stakeholders in Latin America, including payers, manufacturers, and patients, seek to expedite access to technologies. However, uncertainty sometimes surrounds their true benefits and budgetary implications. Managed entry agreements (MEAs) are proposed to address this uncertainty by redistributing risks among key actors. Objectives: The objective of Health Technology Assessment International’s 2023 Latin American Policy Forum was to examine the potential utility of MEA in technology reimbursement and decision-making processes in the region. Methods: This article is based on a background document, a survey, and the deliberative work of the country representatives and others who participated in the Policy Forum. Results: Interest in MEA in Latin America is increasing, with financial agreements being more prevalent than those based on clinical outcomes. During the Policy Forum, potential barriers to MEA implementation were identified, such as the lack of legal frameworks, insufficient reliable data, and, in some cases, distrust among stakeholders. Some potential solutions were also identified, including early stakeholder involvement to enhance dialogue and understanding, and piloting shorter-duration MEA to facilitate the revision of agreement terms, especially in situations of epidemiological uncertainty. Conclusions: The Policy Forum served as a valuable platform for discussing the importance of flexible MEA implementation that acknowledges data uncertainty, promotes transparent dialogue to incorporate opinions and values from all stakeholders, and develops legal frameworks to support effective technology access schemes in Latin America. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | - |
| dc.subject | financial | - |
| dc.subject | Latin America | - |
| dc.subject | managed entry agreements | - |
| dc.subject | risk sharing | - |
| dc.subject | technology assessment | - |
| dc.title | How can managed entry agreements contribute to coverage decisions in Latin America? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0266462324000527 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 39618408 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85210916861 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 40 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. e65 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. e65 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-6348 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001368611800001 | - |
