File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Budget impact analysis of a rituximab intravenous biosimilar in patients with follicular lymphoma and large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Chile

TitleBudget impact analysis of a rituximab intravenous biosimilar in patients with follicular lymphoma and large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Chile
Authors
Keywordsbiosimilars
budget impact analysis
Chile
health system perspective
non-Hodgkin lymphoma
rituximab
Issue Date2024
Citation
GaBI Journal, 2024, v. 13, n. 1, p. 4-13 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: In Chile, access disparities and budget constraints affect the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, even though therapies like rituximab are covered by the Regime of Explicit Health Guarantees. Biosimilars like Rixathon® offer a compelling alternative with similar efficacy at lower cost. This study conducted a budget impact analysis to assess the introduction of Rixathon® for follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL) patients fromChilean healthcare system perspective. Methods: A budget impact model was developed to estimate the cost difference between the actual scenario and a scenario considering greateRixathon® coverage over a five-year period. Annual population was estimated based on rituximab sales data from 2015–2022 adjusted with corresponding factors. This study focused on differences in the total sum of acquisition and administration costs. Several scenarios were developed and analysed, including time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to estimate administration costs. Results: The projected population increases from 1,274 to 1,297 individuals for 2023–2027. Scenario 1 demonstrated that Rixathon® generated net cost savings of US$208,553 in 2023, or US$6,728 per patient, potentially enabling 49 additional patients to access Rixathon®. Similar trends are observed in Scenarios 2 and 3. The TDABC analysis revealed that the increment in administration costs were offset by the savings achieved through Rixathon® acquisition. Conclusion: Incorporating Rixathon® for FL and DLBCL patients was associated with savings in acquisition costs and its coverage could be extended to more patients. Administration costs resulted in a marginal incremental cost that was offset by the biosimilar net savings.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356324
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.163
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbbot, Tom’S-
dc.contributor.authorArmijo, Nicol’S-
dc.contributor.authorPiron, Robin-
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, Manuel-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T07:22:12Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-27T07:22:12Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationGaBI Journal, 2024, v. 13, n. 1, p. 4-13-
dc.identifier.issn2033-6403-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/356324-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In Chile, access disparities and budget constraints affect the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, even though therapies like rituximab are covered by the Regime of Explicit Health Guarantees. Biosimilars like Rixathon® offer a compelling alternative with similar efficacy at lower cost. This study conducted a budget impact analysis to assess the introduction of Rixathon® for follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL) patients fromChilean healthcare system perspective. Methods: A budget impact model was developed to estimate the cost difference between the actual scenario and a scenario considering greateRixathon® coverage over a five-year period. Annual population was estimated based on rituximab sales data from 2015–2022 adjusted with corresponding factors. This study focused on differences in the total sum of acquisition and administration costs. Several scenarios were developed and analysed, including time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to estimate administration costs. Results: The projected population increases from 1,274 to 1,297 individuals for 2023–2027. Scenario 1 demonstrated that Rixathon® generated net cost savings of US$208,553 in 2023, or US$6,728 per patient, potentially enabling 49 additional patients to access Rixathon®. Similar trends are observed in Scenarios 2 and 3. The TDABC analysis revealed that the increment in administration costs were offset by the savings achieved through Rixathon® acquisition. Conclusion: Incorporating Rixathon® for FL and DLBCL patients was associated with savings in acquisition costs and its coverage could be extended to more patients. Administration costs resulted in a marginal incremental cost that was offset by the biosimilar net savings.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofGaBI Journal-
dc.subjectbiosimilars-
dc.subjectbudget impact analysis-
dc.subjectChile-
dc.subjecthealth system perspective-
dc.subjectnon-Hodgkin lymphoma-
dc.subjectrituximab-
dc.titleBudget impact analysis of a rituximab intravenous biosimilar in patients with follicular lymphoma and large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Chile-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.5639/gabij.2024.1301.002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85201292567-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage4-
dc.identifier.epage13-
dc.identifier.eissn2033-6772-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001433057400002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats