File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s40279-018-1008-z
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85055471895
- PMID: 30341595
- WOS: WOS:000462506100007
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Does Aerobic Training Promote the Same Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy as Resistance Training? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
| Title | Does Aerobic Training Promote the Same Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy as Resistance Training? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2019 |
| Citation | Sports Medicine, 2019, v. 49, n. 2, p. 233-254 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: Currently, there are inconsistencies in the body of evidence for the effects of resistance and aerobic training on skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Objective: We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze current evidence on the differences in hypertrophic adaptation to aerobic and resistance training, and to discuss potential reasons for the disparities noted in the literature. Methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed for this review. The Downs and Black checklist was used for the assessment of methodological quality of the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed. In total, three analyses were performed: (1) for whole-muscle knee extensor data; (2) for type I fiber cross-sectional area; and (3) for type II fiber cross-sectional area. Results: The final number of included studies in the present review is 21. All studies were of good or moderate methodological quality. The meta-analysis for whole-muscle hypertrophy resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) in responses between the aerobic training and resistance training interventions. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance over aerobic training, was 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.41–90; I2 = 0%). The meta-analysis for type I fiber cross-sectional area data resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) between the aerobic training and resistance training groups. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance training over aerobic training, was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.44–1.54; I2 = 24%). The meta-analysis of type II fiber cross-sectional area data resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) between the aerobic training and resistance training groups. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance training over aerobic training, was 1.44 (95% confidence interval 0.93–1.95; I2 = 8%). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that single-mode aerobic training does not promote the same skeletal muscle hypertrophy as resistance training. This finding was consistent with measurements of muscle hypertrophy both at the whole-muscle and myofiber levels. While these results are specific to the knee extensor musculature, it can be hypothesized that similar results would be seen for other muscle groups as well. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356156 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 9.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.492 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Grgic, Jozo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mcllvenna, Luke C. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fyfe, Jackson J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sabol, Filip | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bishop, David J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Schoenfeld, Brad J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pedisic, Zeljko | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-27T07:21:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-27T07:21:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sports Medicine, 2019, v. 49, n. 2, p. 233-254 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0112-1642 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356156 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Currently, there are inconsistencies in the body of evidence for the effects of resistance and aerobic training on skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Objective: We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze current evidence on the differences in hypertrophic adaptation to aerobic and resistance training, and to discuss potential reasons for the disparities noted in the literature. Methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed for this review. The Downs and Black checklist was used for the assessment of methodological quality of the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed. In total, three analyses were performed: (1) for whole-muscle knee extensor data; (2) for type I fiber cross-sectional area; and (3) for type II fiber cross-sectional area. Results: The final number of included studies in the present review is 21. All studies were of good or moderate methodological quality. The meta-analysis for whole-muscle hypertrophy resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) in responses between the aerobic training and resistance training interventions. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance over aerobic training, was 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.41–90; I2 = 0%). The meta-analysis for type I fiber cross-sectional area data resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) between the aerobic training and resistance training groups. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance training over aerobic training, was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.44–1.54; I2 = 24%). The meta-analysis of type II fiber cross-sectional area data resulted in a significant pooled difference (p < 0.001) between the aerobic training and resistance training groups. The pooled Hedge’s g, favoring resistance training over aerobic training, was 1.44 (95% confidence interval 0.93–1.95; I2 = 8%). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that single-mode aerobic training does not promote the same skeletal muscle hypertrophy as resistance training. This finding was consistent with measurements of muscle hypertrophy both at the whole-muscle and myofiber levels. While these results are specific to the knee extensor musculature, it can be hypothesized that similar results would be seen for other muscle groups as well. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Sports Medicine | - |
| dc.title | Does Aerobic Training Promote the Same Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy as Resistance Training? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s40279-018-1008-z | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 30341595 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85055471895 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 49 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 233 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 254 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1179-2035 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000462506100007 | - |
