File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/s1665-2681(19)31674-6
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77954570954
- PMID: 20308718
- WOS: WOS:000276976800003
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Endoscopic band ligation versus propranolol for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high risk esophageal varices
| Title | Endoscopic band ligation versus propranolol for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high risk esophageal varices |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Beta-blockers Cirrhosis Endoscopic band ligation Primary prophylaxis Propranolol Randomized controlled trial Variceal bleeding |
| Issue Date | 2010 |
| Citation | Annals of Hepatology, 2010, v. 9, n. 1, p. 15-22 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a common complication of portal hypertension. Current guidelines recommend p-blockers for primary prophylaxis. However, evidence suggests that endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) reduce bleeding episodes. Aims. To compare endoscopic EVL with propranolol (PPL) for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial. Over a 9-year period, 75 patients with cirrhosis and high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) were recruited and allocated to EVL (n=39) or PPL (n=36). Primary outcome was variceal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were survival, source of bleeding and serious adverse events. Analyses were made by intention-to-treat. Results. Baseline characteristics were similar. Medium follow-up was 1647±1096 days. Complete follow-up was achieved in 85% of patients. Variceal bleeding occurred in 12% of EVL and in 25% of PPL group (p=0.17). The actuarial risks of bleeding after 2 years were similar in both groups. Overall mortality was 51% in EVL and 33% in PPL group (p=0.17). Patients in the EVL group showed a lower rate of esophageal variceal bleeding (5.1% v/s 25%, p=0.027) and a higher rate of subcardial variceal bleeding compared with PPL group (7.7% v/s 0%, p=0.027). Serious adverse events related to EVL occurred in 2 patients, including 1 death. Conclusions. The present study supports that PPL should be considered the first choice in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding offering similar effects and lower severe adverse events compared with EVL. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356130 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.996 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Pérez-Ayuso, Rosa María | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Valderrama, Sebastián | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Espinoza, Manuel | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Rollán, Antonio | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sánchez, René | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Otarola, Francisco | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Medina, Brenda | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Riquelme, Arnoldo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-27T07:20:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-27T07:20:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Annals of Hepatology, 2010, v. 9, n. 1, p. 15-22 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1665-2681 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/356130 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a common complication of portal hypertension. Current guidelines recommend p-blockers for primary prophylaxis. However, evidence suggests that endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) reduce bleeding episodes. Aims. To compare endoscopic EVL with propranolol (PPL) for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial. Over a 9-year period, 75 patients with cirrhosis and high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) were recruited and allocated to EVL (n=39) or PPL (n=36). Primary outcome was variceal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were survival, source of bleeding and serious adverse events. Analyses were made by intention-to-treat. Results. Baseline characteristics were similar. Medium follow-up was 1647±1096 days. Complete follow-up was achieved in 85% of patients. Variceal bleeding occurred in 12% of EVL and in 25% of PPL group (p=0.17). The actuarial risks of bleeding after 2 years were similar in both groups. Overall mortality was 51% in EVL and 33% in PPL group (p=0.17). Patients in the EVL group showed a lower rate of esophageal variceal bleeding (5.1% v/s 25%, p=0.027) and a higher rate of subcardial variceal bleeding compared with PPL group (7.7% v/s 0%, p=0.027). Serious adverse events related to EVL occurred in 2 patients, including 1 death. Conclusions. The present study supports that PPL should be considered the first choice in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding offering similar effects and lower severe adverse events compared with EVL. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Hepatology | - |
| dc.subject | Beta-blockers | - |
| dc.subject | Cirrhosis | - |
| dc.subject | Endoscopic band ligation | - |
| dc.subject | Primary prophylaxis | - |
| dc.subject | Propranolol | - |
| dc.subject | Randomized controlled trial | - |
| dc.subject | Variceal bleeding | - |
| dc.title | Endoscopic band ligation versus propranolol for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high risk esophageal varices | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/s1665-2681(19)31674-6 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 20308718 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77954570954 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 15 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 22 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000276976800003 | - |
