File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Mock clinical testing in the validation of fluid-phase biomarkers for head and neck carcinoma diagnosis: Scoping review

TitleMock clinical testing in the validation of fluid-phase biomarkers for head and neck carcinoma diagnosis: Scoping review
Authors
Keywordsdiagnostic accuracy
head and neck cancer
prospective specimen collection
retrospective-blinded evaluation
Issue Date2021
Citation
Head and Neck, 2021, v. 43, n. 2, p. 691-704 How to Cite?
AbstractThis review sought to determine the range and nature of prospective-sampling and blinding methods for validating nonviral biofluid markers diagnostic of head and neck carcinomas. Electronic database searching was conducted to identify studies published in English from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2020. Sixteen studies from 17 articles published between 2011 and 2020 were included in this review. We found that about 3 out of 100 studies utilized at least one of the mock testing approaches for biomarker validation. Protein, mRNA, and metabolomic markers also represented the only groups whose validation has been attempted using these methods. Furthermore, studies that utilized both methods were found to have lower bias concerns on the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Overall, there is a need to include these protocols in research endeavours verifying diagnostic biomarkers for head and neck carcinomas following the preliminary establishment of their classification accuracy.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355421
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.034

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdeoye, John-
dc.contributor.authorWan, Chi Ching Joan-
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-08T03:40:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-08T03:40:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationHead and Neck, 2021, v. 43, n. 2, p. 691-704-
dc.identifier.issn1043-3074-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355421-
dc.description.abstractThis review sought to determine the range and nature of prospective-sampling and blinding methods for validating nonviral biofluid markers diagnostic of head and neck carcinomas. Electronic database searching was conducted to identify studies published in English from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2020. Sixteen studies from 17 articles published between 2011 and 2020 were included in this review. We found that about 3 out of 100 studies utilized at least one of the mock testing approaches for biomarker validation. Protein, mRNA, and metabolomic markers also represented the only groups whose validation has been attempted using these methods. Furthermore, studies that utilized both methods were found to have lower bias concerns on the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Overall, there is a need to include these protocols in research endeavours verifying diagnostic biomarkers for head and neck carcinomas following the preliminary establishment of their classification accuracy.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHead and Neck-
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracy-
dc.subjecthead and neck cancer-
dc.subjectprospective specimen collection-
dc.subjectretrospective-blinded evaluation-
dc.titleMock clinical testing in the validation of fluid-phase biomarkers for head and neck carcinoma diagnosis: Scoping review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hed.26526-
dc.identifier.pmid33151603-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85096678877-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage691-
dc.identifier.epage704-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0347-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats