File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Acceptability of different mechanisms of action of contraception in women: a questionnaire survey

TitleAcceptability of different mechanisms of action of contraception in women: a questionnaire survey
Authors
Issue Date2022
Citation
BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2022, v. 48, n. 2, p. 117-122 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground The mechanism of action of a contraceptive method is an importantg consideration in a woman's choice of contraception. For the development of new methods of contraception it is important to understand the acceptability of different contraceptive mechanisms within a population. Methods We recruited women attending contraceptive, termination of pregnancy or postnatal care services in Hong Kong for a questionnaire survey on their acceptability of the different ways in which contraceptive methods prevent pregnancy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to establish factors which may predict acceptability of the mechanism of action. Results A total of 1448 women completed the survey. The acceptability of contraceptive methods that act by preventing fertilisation ranked highest (78%), followed by those that inhibit ovulation (52%), disrupt implantation (43%) and dislodge an implanted embryo (30%). A history of termination of pregnancy was associated with greater acceptance of all posited contraceptive mechanisms. There was a very low degree of agreement between the declared acceptance of the various contraceptive mechanisms and the ever use of a method with the respective mechanism of action (Cohen's kappa coefficient range 0.017-0.162). Conclusions In this population the acceptability of contraceptive methods that act by preventing fertilisation ranked highest, followed by those that inhibit ovulation, disrupt implantation and dislodge an implanted embryo. Women who had ever had a termination of pregnancy were more likely to accept all the posited contraceptive mechanisms.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355386
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.849

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTong, Yu Wing-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Sue Seen Tsing-
dc.contributor.authorFung, Barbara Wai Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Sharon T.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ernest Hung Yu-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Raymond Hang Wun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-08T03:40:24Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-08T03:40:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2022, v. 48, n. 2, p. 117-122-
dc.identifier.issn2515-1991-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/355386-
dc.description.abstractBackground The mechanism of action of a contraceptive method is an importantg consideration in a woman's choice of contraception. For the development of new methods of contraception it is important to understand the acceptability of different contraceptive mechanisms within a population. Methods We recruited women attending contraceptive, termination of pregnancy or postnatal care services in Hong Kong for a questionnaire survey on their acceptability of the different ways in which contraceptive methods prevent pregnancy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to establish factors which may predict acceptability of the mechanism of action. Results A total of 1448 women completed the survey. The acceptability of contraceptive methods that act by preventing fertilisation ranked highest (78%), followed by those that inhibit ovulation (52%), disrupt implantation (43%) and dislodge an implanted embryo (30%). A history of termination of pregnancy was associated with greater acceptance of all posited contraceptive mechanisms. There was a very low degree of agreement between the declared acceptance of the various contraceptive mechanisms and the ever use of a method with the respective mechanism of action (Cohen's kappa coefficient range 0.017-0.162). Conclusions In this population the acceptability of contraceptive methods that act by preventing fertilisation ranked highest, followed by those that inhibit ovulation, disrupt implantation and dislodge an implanted embryo. Women who had ever had a termination of pregnancy were more likely to accept all the posited contraceptive mechanisms.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health-
dc.titleAcceptability of different mechanisms of action of contraception in women: a questionnaire survey-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201110-
dc.identifier.pmid34725054-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85128487384-
dc.identifier.volume48-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage117-
dc.identifier.epage122-
dc.identifier.eissn2515-2009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats