File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Spre distrugere reciprocă? Trei puncte de vedere privind hotărârea Curții Constituționale Federale germane din 5 mai 2020

TitleSpre distrugere reciprocă? Trei puncte de vedere privind hotărârea Curții Constituționale Federale germane din 5 mai 2020
Authors
Issue Date1-Nov-2020
Citation
Revista Romana de Drept European, 2020, v. 3, p. 55-76 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper, on the Bundesverfassungsgericht's Weiss judgment of 5th May 2020, highlights three implications of the German Federal Constitutional Court's landmark ruling and its constitutional significance with implications for the wider context of Member States' cooperation in the EU and European integration as a whole. We explain the relevant background of the judgment and argue that the specific issue created by the judgment might be addressed quickly but that the resulting judicial turmoil for the broader relationship between the law of the EU and the Member States can only be remedied by treaty changes in the longer term in order to avoid the Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354881
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEngel, A-
dc.contributor.authorNowag, J-
dc.contributor.authorGroussot, X-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-14T00:35:32Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-14T00:35:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-01-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Romana de Drept European, 2020, v. 3, p. 55-76-
dc.identifier.issn2068-8083-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354881-
dc.description.abstractThis paper, on the Bundesverfassungsgericht's Weiss judgment of 5th May 2020, highlights three implications of the German Federal Constitutional Court's landmark ruling and its constitutional significance with implications for the wider context of Member States' cooperation in the EU and European integration as a whole. We explain the relevant background of the judgment and argue that the specific issue created by the judgment might be addressed quickly but that the resulting judicial turmoil for the broader relationship between the law of the EU and the Member States can only be remedied by treaty changes in the longer term in order to avoid the Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Romana de Drept European-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleSpre distrugere reciprocă? Trei puncte de vedere privind hotărârea Curții Constituționale Federale germane din 5 mai 2020-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.volume3-
dc.identifier.spage55-
dc.identifier.epage76-
dc.identifier.issnl2068-8083-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats