File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Sensitivity of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring for scoliosis correction in identifying postoperative neurological deficits: a retrospective chart review of the Scoliosis Research Society morbidity and mortality database

TitleSensitivity of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring for scoliosis correction in identifying postoperative neurological deficits: a retrospective chart review of the Scoliosis Research Society morbidity and mortality database
Authors
KeywordsElectromyography
Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring
Neurogenic motor evoked potential
Neurological deficits
Scoliosis
Sensitivity analysis
Somatosensory evoked potential
Transcranial motor evoked potential
Issue Date24-Feb-2025
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2025, v. 26, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

Surgical intervention is the ultimate treatment for scoliosis, but iatrogenic spinal cord injury is one of the major concerns. Although intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring can aid in detecting and reducing postoperative neurological complications, its use is still controversial.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 6,577 scoliotic patients who underwent surgery for curve correction with a reported complication was conducted. Our dataset was sourced from the morbidity and mortality database of the Scoliosis Research Society spanning the period from 2013 to 2023. The sensitivity of intraoperative monitoring was evaluated.

Results

Intraoperative monitoring was used in 60% of surgeries, while 26% of the reported complications in the study cohort were new postoperative neurologic deficits. The overall monitoring performance indicated a sensitivity of 45%. Neurogenic motor evoked potential showed the best outcomes among the individual monitoring methods. The highest sensitivity (60.4%) was achieved using four monitoring methods, demonstrating significantly better results than one, two, and three methods.

Conclusions

The monitoring practice benefits in distinguishing postoperative neurologic deficits within the scoliosis population. Employing four monitoring techniques yielded the most favourable outcomes.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354815
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.714

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, Kenney Ki Lee-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, Kenny Yat Hong-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Jason Pui Yin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-12T00:35:11Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-12T00:35:11Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-24-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2025, v. 26, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354815-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>Surgical intervention is the ultimate treatment for scoliosis, but iatrogenic spinal cord injury is one of the major concerns. Although intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring can aid in detecting and reducing postoperative neurological complications, its use is still controversial.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review of 6,577 scoliotic patients who underwent surgery for curve correction with a reported complication was conducted. Our dataset was sourced from the morbidity and mortality database of the Scoliosis Research Society spanning the period from 2013 to 2023. The sensitivity of intraoperative monitoring was evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Intraoperative monitoring was used in 60% of surgeries, while 26% of the reported complications in the study cohort were new postoperative neurologic deficits. The overall monitoring performance indicated a sensitivity of 45%. Neurogenic motor evoked potential showed the best outcomes among the individual monitoring methods. The highest sensitivity (60.4%) was achieved using four monitoring methods, demonstrating significantly better results than one, two, and three methods.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The monitoring practice benefits in distinguishing postoperative neurologic deficits within the scoliosis population. Employing four monitoring techniques yielded the most favourable outcomes.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectElectromyography-
dc.subjectIntraoperative electrophysiological monitoring-
dc.subjectNeurogenic motor evoked potential-
dc.subjectNeurological deficits-
dc.subjectScoliosis-
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis-
dc.subjectSomatosensory evoked potential-
dc.subjectTranscranial motor evoked potential-
dc.titleSensitivity of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring for scoliosis correction in identifying postoperative neurological deficits: a retrospective chart review of the Scoliosis Research Society morbidity and mortality database-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-024-08115-4-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85218705424-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2474-
dc.identifier.issnl1471-2474-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats