File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring

TitleThe IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring
Authors
Issue Date19-Jan-2024
PublisherNature Research
Citation
Nature Medicine, 2024, v. 30, n. 1, p. 61-75 How to Cite?
Abstract

The next generation of surgical robotics is poised to disrupt healthcare systems worldwide, requiring new frameworks for evaluation. However, evaluation during a surgical robot’s development is challenging due to their complex evolving nature, potential for wider system disruption and integration with complementary technologies like artificial intelligence. Comparative clinical studies require attention to intervention context, learning curves and standardized outcomes. Long-term monitoring needs to transition toward collaborative, transparent and inclusive consortiums for real-world data collection. Here, the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term monitoring (IDEAL) Robotics Colloquium proposes recommendations for evaluation during development, comparative study and clinical monitoring of surgical robots—providing practical recommendations for developers, clinicians, patients and healthcare systems. Multiple perspectives are considered, including economics, surgical training, human factors, ethics, patient perspectives and sustainability. Further work is needed on standardized metrics, health economic assessment models and global applicability of recommendations.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354458
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 58.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 19.045
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarcus, Hani J.-
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Pedro T.-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Danyal Z.-
dc.contributor.authorLayard Horsfall, Hugo-
dc.contributor.authorHanrahan, John G.-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Simon C.-
dc.contributor.authorBeard, David J.-
dc.contributor.authorBhat, Rani-
dc.contributor.authorCatchpole, Ken-
dc.contributor.authorCook, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorHutchison, Katrina-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Janet-
dc.contributor.authorMelvin, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorStoyanov, Danail-
dc.contributor.authorRovers, Maroeska-
dc.contributor.authorRaison, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorDasgupta, Prokar-
dc.contributor.authorNoonan, David-
dc.contributor.authorStocken, Deborah-
dc.contributor.authorSturt, Georgia-
dc.contributor.authorVanhoestenberghe, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorVasey, Baptiste-
dc.contributor.authorMcCulloch, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorKonge, Lars-
dc.contributor.authorGrantcharov, Teodor-
dc.contributor.authorHarji, Deena-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Kamran-
dc.contributor.authorSparrow, Rob-
dc.contributor.authorLangley, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorKon, Alexander A.-
dc.contributor.authorGoering, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Len-
dc.contributor.authorDraper, Heather-
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Lesley-
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Katrina-
dc.contributor.authorGrutters, Janneke-
dc.contributor.authorIglesias, Cynthia-
dc.contributor.authorCorbacho, Belen-
dc.contributor.authorClifford, Tammy J.-
dc.contributor.authorClark, Alane-
dc.contributor.authorSampietro-Colom, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorMaddern, Guy-
dc.contributor.authorScholte, Mirre-
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Tara-
dc.contributor.authorBisantz, Ann-
dc.contributor.authorCavuoto, Lora-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Denny-
dc.contributor.authorAnger, Jennifer-
dc.contributor.authorSkipworth, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorPickup, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Duncan-
dc.contributor.authorYule, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorRandell, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorWeigl, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Bernard-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Alvin-
dc.contributor.authorKinross, James-
dc.contributor.authorLeitao, Mario M.-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Justin-
dc.contributor.authorSoomro, Naeem-
dc.contributor.authorLama, Sanju-
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, Garnette-
dc.contributor.authorLeparmentier, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorValdastri, Pietro-
dc.contributor.authorBaena, Ferdinando Rodriquez Y.-
dc.contributor.authorPeine, Bill-
dc.contributor.authorMahoney, Rich-
dc.contributor.authorKwok, Ka Wai-
dc.contributor.authorAnderon, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorHorwood, Nigel-
dc.contributor.authorKerr, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorKuntz, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorZenati, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorBaber, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorVayena, Effy-
dc.contributor.authorFicuciello, Fanny-
dc.contributor.authorChari, Aswin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-08T00:51:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-08T00:51:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-19-
dc.identifier.citationNature Medicine, 2024, v. 30, n. 1, p. 61-75-
dc.identifier.issn1078-8956-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354458-
dc.description.abstract<p>The next generation of surgical robotics is poised to disrupt healthcare systems worldwide, requiring new frameworks for evaluation. However, evaluation during a surgical robot’s development is challenging due to their complex evolving nature, potential for wider system disruption and integration with complementary technologies like artificial intelligence. Comparative clinical studies require attention to intervention context, learning curves and standardized outcomes. Long-term monitoring needs to transition toward collaborative, transparent and inclusive consortiums for real-world data collection. Here, the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term monitoring (IDEAL) Robotics Colloquium proposes recommendations for evaluation during development, comparative study and clinical monitoring of surgical robots—providing practical recommendations for developers, clinicians, patients and healthcare systems. Multiple perspectives are considered, including economics, surgical training, human factors, ethics, patient perspectives and sustainability. Further work is needed on standardized metrics, health economic assessment models and global applicability of recommendations.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNature Research-
dc.relation.ispartofNature Medicine-
dc.titleThe IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7-
dc.identifier.pmid38242979-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85182623656-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage61-
dc.identifier.epage75-
dc.identifier.eissn1546-170X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001284785400022-
dc.identifier.issnl1078-8956-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats