File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Influence of posterior mandibular dimensions on alveolar bone microarchitecture

TitleInfluence of posterior mandibular dimensions on alveolar bone microarchitecture
Authors
KeywordsAlveolar bone
Bone
Dental implant
Endosseous implant
Evidence-based dentistry
Trabecular
Issue Date2017
Citation
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2017, v. 32, n. 2, p. 423-430 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of posterior mandibular dimensions (height and width at various levels) on alveolar bone microarchitecture using microcomputed tomography (micro- CT). Materials and Methods: Partially edentulous subjects with one missing molar were included in the study. A bone core biopsy was performed at the site of planned implant surgery. For each patient, alveolar morphologic and architectural characteristics were analyzed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and micro-CT imaging. Two parameters for height (apicocoronal residual height [RH] and residual ridge from inferior alveolar canal [RHN]) and three for buccolingual width (residual width at 5 mm [RW1], at 10 mm [RW2], and at 15 mm [RW3]) were determined using CBCT. Additionally, 10 parameters were obtained from micro-CT to determine microarchitecture. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the correlation between the morphologic and microarchitectural variables. Results: Significant positive correlations (P < .05) were found between RH and bone volumetric fraction (BV/TV) (rs = 0.34) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) (rs = 0.45). A significant negative correlation was found between RH and the bone-specific surface (BS/BV) (rs = -0.34). A strong significant negative correlation was found between trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp) and RW1 (rs = -0.42). None of the other variables reached statistical significance. Conclusion: Posterior mandibular dimensions may affect bony architectural characteristics.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354377
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.702
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yiqun-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Wenjie-
dc.contributor.authorGalindo-Moreno, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorMontanero-Fernandez, Jesus-
dc.contributor.authorSheridan, Rachel A.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom Lay-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Feng-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:48:13Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:48:13Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2017, v. 32, n. 2, p. 423-430-
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354377-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of posterior mandibular dimensions (height and width at various levels) on alveolar bone microarchitecture using microcomputed tomography (micro- CT). Materials and Methods: Partially edentulous subjects with one missing molar were included in the study. A bone core biopsy was performed at the site of planned implant surgery. For each patient, alveolar morphologic and architectural characteristics were analyzed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and micro-CT imaging. Two parameters for height (apicocoronal residual height [RH] and residual ridge from inferior alveolar canal [RHN]) and three for buccolingual width (residual width at 5 mm [RW1], at 10 mm [RW2], and at 15 mm [RW3]) were determined using CBCT. Additionally, 10 parameters were obtained from micro-CT to determine microarchitecture. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the correlation between the morphologic and microarchitectural variables. Results: Significant positive correlations (P < .05) were found between RH and bone volumetric fraction (BV/TV) (rs = 0.34) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) (rs = 0.45). A significant negative correlation was found between RH and the bone-specific surface (BS/BV) (rs = -0.34). A strong significant negative correlation was found between trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp) and RW1 (rs = -0.42). None of the other variables reached statistical significance. Conclusion: Posterior mandibular dimensions may affect bony architectural characteristics.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants-
dc.subjectAlveolar bone-
dc.subjectBone-
dc.subjectDental implant-
dc.subjectEndosseous implant-
dc.subjectEvidence-based dentistry-
dc.subjectTrabecular-
dc.titleInfluence of posterior mandibular dimensions on alveolar bone microarchitecture-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.5144-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85015783027-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage423-
dc.identifier.epage430-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000397969300029-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats