File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The Effect of Fiducial Marker Number and Configuration on Registration Error in Dynamic Implant Surgery

TitleThe Effect of Fiducial Marker Number and Configuration on Registration Error in Dynamic Implant Surgery
Authors
Keywordsedentulous maxilla
navigation surgery
registration
zygomatic implant
Issue Date2023
Citation
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2023, v. 38, n. 4, p. 727-732 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To verify the effect of fiducial marker number and configuration on target registration error (TRE) for dynamic computer-aided zygomatic implant surgery. Material and Methods: All patients who underwent zygomatic implant surgery with navigation from January 2018 to December 2021 were enrolled. For each patient, 6 to 8 miniscrews were placed intraorally as fiducial markers before the surgery. After the registration procedure, the TRE, which represents the distance between the target of the image space and the real position of the fiducial markers, was calculated. SPSS (22.0) was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 325 titanium miniscrews were placed in 47 patients who underwent zygomatic implant placement by navigation. The lowest TRE was 0.2 mm, compared to the highest TRE of 1.9 mm. There was no significant difference in the mean TRE value among the different titanium miniscrew groups (P =.07). A total of 8 miniscrews in 7 patients were lost in the maxillary tuberosity area prior to and during navigation surgery, which resulted in an irregular polygonal distribution of fiducial markers. However, there was no statistically significant difference in TRE between a polygonal distribution (0.62 ± 0.35 mm) and an irregular polygonal distribution (0.68 ± 0.33 mm) (P =.35). Conclusion: A scattered, polygonal distribution with of a minimum of five fiducial markers in an edentulous maxilla could achieve acceptable TRE values in registration. It seems that the registration error was not influenced by the absence of one corner in a polygon distribution.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354294
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.702
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShen, Yihan-
dc.contributor.authorTao, Baoxin-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Yuanyuan-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yiqun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:47:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:47:43Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2023, v. 38, n. 4, p. 727-732-
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354294-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To verify the effect of fiducial marker number and configuration on target registration error (TRE) for dynamic computer-aided zygomatic implant surgery. Material and Methods: All patients who underwent zygomatic implant surgery with navigation from January 2018 to December 2021 were enrolled. For each patient, 6 to 8 miniscrews were placed intraorally as fiducial markers before the surgery. After the registration procedure, the TRE, which represents the distance between the target of the image space and the real position of the fiducial markers, was calculated. SPSS (22.0) was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 325 titanium miniscrews were placed in 47 patients who underwent zygomatic implant placement by navigation. The lowest TRE was 0.2 mm, compared to the highest TRE of 1.9 mm. There was no significant difference in the mean TRE value among the different titanium miniscrew groups (P =.07). A total of 8 miniscrews in 7 patients were lost in the maxillary tuberosity area prior to and during navigation surgery, which resulted in an irregular polygonal distribution of fiducial markers. However, there was no statistically significant difference in TRE between a polygonal distribution (0.62 ± 0.35 mm) and an irregular polygonal distribution (0.68 ± 0.33 mm) (P =.35). Conclusion: A scattered, polygonal distribution with of a minimum of five fiducial markers in an edentulous maxilla could achieve acceptable TRE values in registration. It seems that the registration error was not influenced by the absence of one corner in a polygon distribution.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants-
dc.subjectedentulous maxilla-
dc.subjectnavigation surgery-
dc.subjectregistration-
dc.subjectzygomatic implant-
dc.titleThe Effect of Fiducial Marker Number and Configuration on Registration Error in Dynamic Implant Surgery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/JOMI.10134-
dc.identifier.pmid37669525-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85169765745-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage727-
dc.identifier.epage732-
dc.identifier.eissn1942-4434-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001142545300010-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats