File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85133469218
- PMID: 35679989
- WOS: WOS:001096068900001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study
| Title | Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Accuracy Computer-assisted surgery Phantom study Robot-assisted surgery |
| Issue Date | 2022 |
| Citation | Journal of Dentistry, 2022, v. 123, article no. 104170 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Objectives: To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a dynamic navigation and a robotic system. Methods: Eighty three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms, including edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, were assigned to two groups: a dynamic navigation system (Beidou-SNS) group and a robotic system (Hybrid Robotic System for Dental Implant Surgery, HRS-DIS) group. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the implants in 3D world were measured after pre-operative plans and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was applied, and a p value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 480 implants were placed in 80 phantoms. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation system and robotic system groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 0.96 ± 0.57 mm vs. 0.83 ± 0.55 mm (p=0.04), a mean exit deviation of 1.06 ± 0.59 mm vs. 0.91 ± 0.56 mm (p=0.04), and a mean angle deviation of 2.41± 1.42° vs. 1 ± 0.48° (p<0.00). Conclusions: The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that this prototype robotic system (HRS-DIS) could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery. Clinical significance: This in vitro study is of clinical interest because it preliminarily shows that a robotic system exhibits lower deviations of dental implants than a dynamic navigation system, in dental implant surgery, in both partially and completely edentulous jaws. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354234 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tao, Baoxin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Feng, Yuan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fan, Xingqi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhuang, Minjie | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Xiaojun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Feng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wu, Yiqun | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T08:47:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T08:47:20Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Dentistry, 2022, v. 123, article no. 104170 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0300-5712 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354234 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a dynamic navigation and a robotic system. Methods: Eighty three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms, including edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, were assigned to two groups: a dynamic navigation system (Beidou-SNS) group and a robotic system (Hybrid Robotic System for Dental Implant Surgery, HRS-DIS) group. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the implants in 3D world were measured after pre-operative plans and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was applied, and a p value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 480 implants were placed in 80 phantoms. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation system and robotic system groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 0.96 ± 0.57 mm vs. 0.83 ± 0.55 mm (p=0.04), a mean exit deviation of 1.06 ± 0.59 mm vs. 0.91 ± 0.56 mm (p=0.04), and a mean angle deviation of 2.41± 1.42° vs. 1 ± 0.48° (p<0.00). Conclusions: The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that this prototype robotic system (HRS-DIS) could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery. Clinical significance: This in vitro study is of clinical interest because it preliminarily shows that a robotic system exhibits lower deviations of dental implants than a dynamic navigation system, in dental implant surgery, in both partially and completely edentulous jaws. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dentistry | - |
| dc.subject | Accuracy | - |
| dc.subject | Computer-assisted surgery | - |
| dc.subject | Phantom study | - |
| dc.subject | Robot-assisted surgery | - |
| dc.title | Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35679989 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85133469218 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 123 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 104170 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 104170 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001096068900001 | - |
