File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The Possibility of Lawful Act Economic Duress: Pakistan International Airlines Corp v Times Travel (UK) Ltd

TitleThe Possibility of Lawful Act Economic Duress: Pakistan International Airlines Corp v Times Travel (UK) Ltd
Authors
KeywordsContract
Economic duress
Rescission ab initio
Issue Date2023
Citation
Modern Law Review, 2023, v. 86, n. 1, p. 238-248 How to Cite?
AbstractThe voidability of a contract procured by ‘economic duress’ is now well-established, but the precise boundaries of the doctrine remain contested. In Pakistan International Airlines Corp v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40, the Supreme Court confronted the longstanding controversy as to whether a threat to perform a lawful act can provide grounds for a threatened party to avoid a contract for economic duress. This note argues that the Court's decision to affirm the existence of ‘lawful act duress’ is welcome. It is further argued that the specific kind of lawful act duress identified by the majority and relevant to determining the appeal, described as ‘deliberate maneuvering via illegitimate means’, provides helpful (and defensible) clarification of the content of this doctrine, and that the Court was correct to hold that the contract in Times Travel was not voidable on this basis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354225
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.267
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPilkington, Timothy-
dc.contributor.authorWinterton, David-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:47:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:47:17Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationModern Law Review, 2023, v. 86, n. 1, p. 238-248-
dc.identifier.issn0026-7961-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354225-
dc.description.abstractThe voidability of a contract procured by ‘economic duress’ is now well-established, but the precise boundaries of the doctrine remain contested. In Pakistan International Airlines Corp v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40, the Supreme Court confronted the longstanding controversy as to whether a threat to perform a lawful act can provide grounds for a threatened party to avoid a contract for economic duress. This note argues that the Court's decision to affirm the existence of ‘lawful act duress’ is welcome. It is further argued that the specific kind of lawful act duress identified by the majority and relevant to determining the appeal, described as ‘deliberate maneuvering via illegitimate means’, provides helpful (and defensible) clarification of the content of this doctrine, and that the Court was correct to hold that the contract in Times Travel was not voidable on this basis.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofModern Law Review-
dc.subjectContract-
dc.subjectEconomic duress-
dc.subjectRescission ab initio-
dc.titleThe Possibility of Lawful Act Economic Duress: Pakistan International Airlines Corp v Times Travel (UK) Ltd-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-2230.12740-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85127412383-
dc.identifier.volume86-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage238-
dc.identifier.epage248-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2230-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000776608200001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats