File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The feasibility of zygomatic implant quad approach in patients with tooth agenesis: a radiographic analysis

TitleThe feasibility of zygomatic implant quad approach in patients with tooth agenesis: a radiographic analysis
Authors
KeywordsBone-to-implant contact
Tooth agenesis
Zygomatic implant quad approach
Issue Date2021
Citation
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue / Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2021, v. 30, n. 2, p. 196-200 How to Cite?
AbstractPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of zygomatic implant quad approach in patients with tooth agenesis. METHODS: Based on the data from cone-beam CT (CBCT), twenty one patients with tooth agenesis who were planned to receive zygomatic implant quad approach were enrolled. The radiographic bone-to-implant contact (rHSIC) of each zygomatic implant placed virtually in patients' zygomatic segment was measured. SPSS 25.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients' plans of zygomatic implant quad approach were completed (12 men and 8 women). A total of 80 zygomatic implants were placed virtually and the average rBIC of zygomatic segment was (13.85 3.29) mm. ITie rBIC values of 40 mesial zygomatic implants and 40 distal zygomatic implants were (13.80 3.74) mm and (13.90 2.81) mm, respectively(P>0.05). The average rBIC in male of 24 mesial zygomatic implants and 24 distal zygomatic implants were(14.21 4.08) mm and(14.31 3.18) mm, respectively, slightly higher than those in female of 16 mesial zygomatic implants and 16 distal zygomatic implants, which were (13.18+3.18) mm and (13.29 2.10) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (A^O.05). The average rBIC of 15 extra sinus zygomatic implants, 46 against sinus lateral wall zygomatic implants and 19 intra-sinus zygomatic implants were (16.27 2.95), (13.87+3.10) and (11.88+2.78) mm, respectively. There was significant difference between the extra sinus zygomatic implants and the other lwo(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to plan zygomatic implant quad approach for patients with tooth agenesis. Zygomatic implants can get adequate rBIC in zygomatic segment and to provide sufficient support and retention of the superstructure.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354192
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.125

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Sha Min-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Kang-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hao Wei-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yi Qun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:47:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:47:04Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationShanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue / Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2021, v. 30, n. 2, p. 196-200-
dc.identifier.issn1006-7248-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354192-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of zygomatic implant quad approach in patients with tooth agenesis. METHODS: Based on the data from cone-beam CT (CBCT), twenty one patients with tooth agenesis who were planned to receive zygomatic implant quad approach were enrolled. The radiographic bone-to-implant contact (rHSIC) of each zygomatic implant placed virtually in patients' zygomatic segment was measured. SPSS 25.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients' plans of zygomatic implant quad approach were completed (12 men and 8 women). A total of 80 zygomatic implants were placed virtually and the average rBIC of zygomatic segment was (13.85 3.29) mm. ITie rBIC values of 40 mesial zygomatic implants and 40 distal zygomatic implants were (13.80 3.74) mm and (13.90 2.81) mm, respectively(P>0.05). The average rBIC in male of 24 mesial zygomatic implants and 24 distal zygomatic implants were(14.21 4.08) mm and(14.31 3.18) mm, respectively, slightly higher than those in female of 16 mesial zygomatic implants and 16 distal zygomatic implants, which were (13.18+3.18) mm and (13.29 2.10) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (A^O.05). The average rBIC of 15 extra sinus zygomatic implants, 46 against sinus lateral wall zygomatic implants and 19 intra-sinus zygomatic implants were (16.27 2.95), (13.87+3.10) and (11.88+2.78) mm, respectively. There was significant difference between the extra sinus zygomatic implants and the other lwo(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to plan zygomatic implant quad approach for patients with tooth agenesis. Zygomatic implants can get adequate rBIC in zygomatic segment and to provide sufficient support and retention of the superstructure.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofShanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue / Shanghai Journal of Stomatology-
dc.subjectBone-to-implant contact-
dc.subjectTooth agenesis-
dc.subjectZygomatic implant quad approach-
dc.titleThe feasibility of zygomatic implant quad approach in patients with tooth agenesis: a radiographic analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.19439/j.sjos.2021.02.017-
dc.identifier.pmid34109362-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85107948789-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage196-
dc.identifier.epage200-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats