File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Alveolar bone architecture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleAlveolar bone architecture: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsAlveolar bone grafting
Bone and bones
Dental implantation, endosseous
Dental implants
Evidence-based dentistry
Issue Date2015
Citation
Journal of Periodontology, 2015, v. 86, n. 11, p. 1231-1248 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: There is a need for studying bone characteristics systematically for a better understanding of planning (i.e., timing of placement and loading) and outcomes of implant therapy. Therefore, the aim of the present review is to evaluate alveolar bone microarchitecture and its modifiers. Methods: Two independent reviewers conducted electronic and manual literature searches in several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles published up to February 2015 reporting alveolar bone microstructure. The random-effect model was applied to calculate the weighted mean (WM) of total bone volume (TBV), which has a range from 0 to 1. TBV was stratified by anatomic locations, atrophic status, and types of specimens. Correlations between TBV and other bone-related parameters were also analyzed. Results: A total of 800 articles were initially identified. After abstract/full-text review, 24 articles were included in the systematic review, of which 23 were also included in the quantitative analysis. The WM TBV was 0.365 (95% confidence interval = 0.278 to 0.452), higher in the maxillary/ mandibular anterior sites than the maxillary/mandibular posterior sites. However, great variations existed within each anatomic location. Additionally, WM TBV was lower in atrophic sites than non-atrophic sites. TBV was correlated negatively with trabecular spacing (R2 = 0.11). Conclusions: The present systematic review suggests that the TBV might not be different between the defined anatomic locations. However, the atrophy status might influence TBV.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354144
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.362
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun Liang-
dc.contributor.authorGalindo-Moreno, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorElnayef, Basel-
dc.contributor.authorDel Amo, Fernando Suarez Lopez-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Feng-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom Lay-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:46:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:46:44Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, 2015, v. 86, n. 11, p. 1231-1248-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354144-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is a need for studying bone characteristics systematically for a better understanding of planning (i.e., timing of placement and loading) and outcomes of implant therapy. Therefore, the aim of the present review is to evaluate alveolar bone microarchitecture and its modifiers. Methods: Two independent reviewers conducted electronic and manual literature searches in several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles published up to February 2015 reporting alveolar bone microstructure. The random-effect model was applied to calculate the weighted mean (WM) of total bone volume (TBV), which has a range from 0 to 1. TBV was stratified by anatomic locations, atrophic status, and types of specimens. Correlations between TBV and other bone-related parameters were also analyzed. Results: A total of 800 articles were initially identified. After abstract/full-text review, 24 articles were included in the systematic review, of which 23 were also included in the quantitative analysis. The WM TBV was 0.365 (95% confidence interval = 0.278 to 0.452), higher in the maxillary/ mandibular anterior sites than the maxillary/mandibular posterior sites. However, great variations existed within each anatomic location. Additionally, WM TBV was lower in atrophic sites than non-atrophic sites. TBV was correlated negatively with trabecular spacing (R2 = 0.11). Conclusions: The present systematic review suggests that the TBV might not be different between the defined anatomic locations. However, the atrophy status might influence TBV.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology-
dc.subjectAlveolar bone grafting-
dc.subjectBone and bones-
dc.subjectDental implantation, endosseous-
dc.subjectDental implants-
dc.subjectEvidence-based dentistry-
dc.titleAlveolar bone architecture: A systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2015.150263-
dc.identifier.pmid26177631-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84946044375-
dc.identifier.volume86-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage1231-
dc.identifier.epage1248-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000364162600006-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats