File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0022034518772283
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85047378515
- PMID: 29772189
- WOS: WOS:000445230700007
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of Intraoral Bone Regeneration with Iliac and Alveolar BMSCs
| Title | Comparison of Intraoral Bone Regeneration with Iliac and Alveolar BMSCs |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | bioengineering bone remodeling bone substitutes dental implants osseointegration tissue engineering |
| Issue Date | 2018 |
| Citation | Journal of Dental Research, 2018, v. 97, n. 11, p. 1229-1235 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This study compared the osteogenic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) of iliac and alveolar origins (I-BMSCs and Al-BMSCs, respectively), which were transplanted in combination with β tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in peri-implant bone defects to investigate the osseointegration between dental implants and tissue-engineered bone in dogs. Specifically, I-BMSCs and Al-BMSCs were cultured, characterized, and seeded on β-TCP and subjected to immunoblotting analyses and alkaline phosphatase activity assays. Subsequently, these cell-seeded scaffolds were implanted into defects that were freshly generated in the mandibular premolar areas of 4 dogs. The defects were covered with β-TCP + Al-BMSCs (n = 6), β-TCP + I-BMSCs (n = 6), or β-TCP (n = 6) or served as the blank control (n = 6). After healing for 12 wk, the formation and mineralization of new bones were assessed through micro–computed tomographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses, and bone-to-implant contacts were measured in the specimens. It was evident that in this large animal model, I-BMSCs and Al-BMSCs manifested similarly strong osteogenic potential, as significantly more new bone was formed in the Al-BMSC and I-BMSC groups than otherwise (P < 0.01). Therefore, Al-BMSCs are emerging as an efficient alternative for autologous mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative dental and maxillofacial therapies. I-BMSCs, if not restricted in their bioavailability, can also be of great utility in bone tissue–engineering applications. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354118 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.909 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, F. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Y. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhou, J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Xu, M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zheng, W. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Huang, W. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhou, W. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shen, Y. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhao, K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wu, Y. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zou, D. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T08:46:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T08:46:34Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Dental Research, 2018, v. 97, n. 11, p. 1229-1235 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0022-0345 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354118 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This study compared the osteogenic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) of iliac and alveolar origins (I-BMSCs and Al-BMSCs, respectively), which were transplanted in combination with β tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in peri-implant bone defects to investigate the osseointegration between dental implants and tissue-engineered bone in dogs. Specifically, I-BMSCs and Al-BMSCs were cultured, characterized, and seeded on β-TCP and subjected to immunoblotting analyses and alkaline phosphatase activity assays. Subsequently, these cell-seeded scaffolds were implanted into defects that were freshly generated in the mandibular premolar areas of 4 dogs. The defects were covered with β-TCP + Al-BMSCs (n = 6), β-TCP + I-BMSCs (n = 6), or β-TCP (n = 6) or served as the blank control (n = 6). After healing for 12 wk, the formation and mineralization of new bones were assessed through micro–computed tomographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses, and bone-to-implant contacts were measured in the specimens. It was evident that in this large animal model, I-BMSCs and Al-BMSCs manifested similarly strong osteogenic potential, as significantly more new bone was formed in the Al-BMSC and I-BMSC groups than otherwise (P < 0.01). Therefore, Al-BMSCs are emerging as an efficient alternative for autologous mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative dental and maxillofacial therapies. I-BMSCs, if not restricted in their bioavailability, can also be of great utility in bone tissue–engineering applications. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dental Research | - |
| dc.subject | bioengineering | - |
| dc.subject | bone remodeling | - |
| dc.subject | bone substitutes | - |
| dc.subject | dental implants | - |
| dc.subject | osseointegration | - |
| dc.subject | tissue engineering | - |
| dc.title | Comparison of Intraoral Bone Regeneration with Iliac and Alveolar BMSCs | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0022034518772283 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 29772189 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85047378515 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 97 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 11 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1229 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1235 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1544-0591 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000445230700007 | - |
