File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/02673037.2024.2428742
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85209814375
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic
Title | COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | China COVID-19 pandemic housing aspiration insecure occupancy Private renting tenure inequality |
Issue Date | 19-Nov-2024 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Citation | Housing Studies, 2024 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In early 2020, while China’s centralised governance response rapidly brought COVID-19 under control, tenure inequality and private rental sector precarity continued unabated. Drawing on stakeholder interviews in Shanghai, nation-wide renter complaints analysis, and a review of government pandemic reactions, this paper reveals the stark contrast between the neglect of renters’ rights and stringent public health measures. Under this prevailing governance model, renters’ wellbeing–including the right to secure occupancy–was effectively over-ridden during the COVID-19 emergency. This approach will have further degraded the reputation and appeal of rental tenure, detracting from state aspirations for greater equality between renting and owner-occupation–the Chinese Government’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative, ongoing since 2017. The study highlights how pandemic responses exacerbated existing housing inequalities and argues for proactive government commitments to protect marginalised populations’ secure occupancy and avoid accentuating tenure inequality during crisis periods. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354034 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.054 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhu Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pawson, Hal | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-06T00:35:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-06T00:35:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-11-19 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Housing Studies, 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0267-3037 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/354034 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>In early 2020, while China’s centralised governance response rapidly brought COVID-19 under control, tenure inequality and private rental sector precarity continued unabated. Drawing on stakeholder interviews in Shanghai, nation-wide renter complaints analysis, and a review of government pandemic reactions, this paper reveals the stark contrast between the neglect of renters’ rights and stringent public health measures. Under this prevailing governance model, renters’ wellbeing–including the right to secure occupancy–was effectively over-ridden during the COVID-19 emergency. This approach will have further degraded the reputation and appeal of rental tenure, detracting from state aspirations for greater equality between renting and owner-occupation–the Chinese Government’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative, ongoing since 2017. The study highlights how pandemic responses exacerbated existing housing inequalities and argues for proactive government commitments to protect marginalised populations’ secure occupancy and avoid accentuating tenure inequality during crisis periods.<br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Housing Studies | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | China | - |
dc.subject | COVID-19 pandemic | - |
dc.subject | housing aspiration | - |
dc.subject | insecure occupancy | - |
dc.subject | Private renting | - |
dc.subject | tenure inequality | - |
dc.title | COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02673037.2024.2428742 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85209814375 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1466-1810 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0267-3037 | - |