File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155404
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85195850603
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: PRAME expression in genital melanocytic lesions – Potential diagnostic pitfall of intermediate expression in atypical genital nevi
Title | PRAME expression in genital melanocytic lesions – Potential diagnostic pitfall of intermediate expression in atypical genital nevi |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Atypical genital nevus Melanoma PRAME Special site nevus |
Issue Date | 1-Aug-2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Pathology - Research and Practice, 2024, v. 260 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction: The Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunostain has seen significant diagnostic use in confirming malignancy for melanocytic lesions. However, the expression of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions have not been reported. In this study, PRAME staining was performed on a cohort of genital melanocytic lesions, aiming to investigate the diagnostic role of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions and its expression in atypical genital nevi. Methodology: A cohort including genital invasive melanoma, melanoma-in-situ, atypical genital nevus (AGN), compound nevus, intradermal nevus, blue nevus, lentigo and melanosis was retrieved with histology reviewed and PRAME immunostaining performed. Results: A total of 66 cases were reviewed. The average proportion expression of PRAME were 56.75 % and 57.43 % for invasive melanoma and melanoma-in-situ, with average H-scores of 153.5/300 and 163.14/300 respectively, which were greater than AGN (3.25 %, 7.75/300, p<0.001), compound/intradermal nevi, lentigo/melanosis, and background junctional melanocytes (<1 %, <1/300, p<0.001). The different cutoffs of PRAME expression, the sensitivity and specificity were 65.22 % and 100 % (>100/300); 69.57 % and 95.83 % (>10/300); and 82.61 % and 93.75 % (≥1/300) respectively. Low level PRAME expression was seen in half of the cases of AGN (n=2/4, 50 %), and at low cutoffs (>10/300 and ≥1/300) unable to differentiate invasive melanoma from AGN (p>0.05). Conclusions: For genital melanocytic lesions, PRAME immunostain shows high specificity at strong and diffuse staining. AGN not uncommonly display low level expression. Focal and/or weak PRAME expression should not be considered as an absolute indication of malignancy, and comprehensive histological assessment remains the key to accurate diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/353862 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.677 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Joanna Ka Man | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Paul Cheung Lung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chow, Chit | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Joshua Jing Xi | - |
dc.contributor.author | To, Ka Fai | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-28T00:35:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-28T00:35:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Pathology - Research and Practice, 2024, v. 260 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0344-0338 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/353862 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Introduction: The Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunostain has seen significant diagnostic use in confirming malignancy for melanocytic lesions. However, the expression of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions have not been reported. In this study, PRAME staining was performed on a cohort of genital melanocytic lesions, aiming to investigate the diagnostic role of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions and its expression in atypical genital nevi. Methodology: A cohort including genital invasive melanoma, melanoma-in-situ, atypical genital nevus (AGN), compound nevus, intradermal nevus, blue nevus, lentigo and melanosis was retrieved with histology reviewed and PRAME immunostaining performed. Results: A total of 66 cases were reviewed. The average proportion expression of PRAME were 56.75 % and 57.43 % for invasive melanoma and melanoma-in-situ, with average H-scores of 153.5/300 and 163.14/300 respectively, which were greater than AGN (3.25 %, 7.75/300, p<0.001), compound/intradermal nevi, lentigo/melanosis, and background junctional melanocytes (<1 %, <1/300, p<0.001). The different cutoffs of PRAME expression, the sensitivity and specificity were 65.22 % and 100 % (>100/300); 69.57 % and 95.83 % (>10/300); and 82.61 % and 93.75 % (≥1/300) respectively. Low level PRAME expression was seen in half of the cases of AGN (n=2/4, 50 %), and at low cutoffs (>10/300 and ≥1/300) unable to differentiate invasive melanoma from AGN (p>0.05). Conclusions: For genital melanocytic lesions, PRAME immunostain shows high specificity at strong and diffuse staining. AGN not uncommonly display low level expression. Focal and/or weak PRAME expression should not be considered as an absolute indication of malignancy, and comprehensive histological assessment remains the key to accurate diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Pathology - Research and Practice | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Atypical genital nevus | - |
dc.subject | Melanoma | - |
dc.subject | PRAME | - |
dc.subject | Special site nevus | - |
dc.title | PRAME expression in genital melanocytic lesions – Potential diagnostic pitfall of intermediate expression in atypical genital nevi | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155404 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85195850603 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 260 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0344-0338 | - |